Literature DB >> 27766710

Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort.

Sungheon Gene Kim1,2, Melanie Freed1,2, Ana Paula Klautau Leite1,2, Jin Zhang1,2, Claudia Seuss1,2, Linda Moy1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic utility of contrast kinetic analysis for breast lesions and background parenchyma of women undergoing MRI-guided biopsies, for whom standard clinical analysis had failed to separate benign and malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 115 women who had indeterminate lesions based on routine diagnostic breast MRI exams and underwent an MRI (3 Tesla) -guided biopsy of one or more lesions suspicious for breast cancer. Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI was performed using a radial stack-of-stars three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence and modified k-space weighted image contrast image reconstruction. Contrast kinetic model analysis was conducted to characterize the contrast enhancement patterns measured in lesions and background parenchyma (BP). The transfer rate (Ktrans ), interstitial volume fraction (ve ), and vascular volume fraction (vp ) estimated from the lesion and BP were used to separate malignant from benign lesions.
RESULTS: The patients with malignant lesions had significantly (P < 0.05) higher median lesion-Ktrans (0.081 min-1 ), higher median BP-Ktrans (0.032 min-1 ), and BP-vp (0.020) than those without malignant lesions (0.056 min-1 , 0.017 min-1 and 0.012, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the BP-Ktrans (0.687) was highest among the single parameters and higher than that of the lesion-Ktrans (0.664). The combined logistic regression model of lesion-Ktrans , lesion-ve , BP-Ktrans , BP-ve , and BP-vp had the highest AUC of 0.730.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the contrast kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data can be used to differentiate the malignant lesions from the benign and high-risk lesions among the indeterminate breast lesions recommended for MRI-guided biopsy exams. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1385-1393.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; breast cancer; breast compression; contrast kinetic analysis; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766710      PMCID: PMC5395340          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  38 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Evaluation of the kinetic properties of background parenchymal enhancement throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Alana R Amarosa; Jason McKellop; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Melanie Moccaldi; Tess V Clendenen; James S Babb; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Linda Moy; Sungheon Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  Samantha L Heller; Linda Moy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.

Authors:  Mary C Mahoney; Constantine Gatsonis; Lucy Hanna; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Boo-Kyung Han; Mitchell D Schnall; Susan G Orel; Mark Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  13 in total

1.  Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.

Authors:  Hong-Li Liu; Min Zong; Han Wei; Jian-Juan Lou; Si-Qi Wang; Qi-Gui Zou; Hai-Bin Shi; Yan-Ni Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Estimation of the capillary level input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Jonghyun Bae; Zhengnan Huang; Florian Knoll; Krzysztof Geras; Terlika Pandit Sood; Li Feng; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics.

Authors:  Qihao Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Michele Drotman; Christine Chen; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Weiyuan Huang; Liangdong Zhou; John Morgan; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Automation of pattern recognition analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data to characterize intratumoral vascular heterogeneity.

Authors:  SoHyun Han; Radka Stoyanova; Hansol Lee; Sean D Carlin; Jason A Koutcher; HyungJoon Cho; Ellen Ackerstaff
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?

Authors:  Nicole Wake; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Koji Fujimoto; Linda Moy; Daniel K Sodickson; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Advances in Diffusion and Perfusion MRI for Quantitative Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Mehran Baboli; Jin Zhang; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2019-12-02

8.  A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Claudio Spick; Melanie Schernthaner; Margaretha Rudas; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Julia Furtner; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ruimin Li; Ning Mao; Qin Li; Tingting Jiang; Qianqian Chen; Shaofeng Duan; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in borderline breast lesions upgraded and not upgraded at definitive histopathological examination after surgical excision.

Authors:  Corrado Tagliati; Paola Piccinni; Paola Ercolani; Elisabetta Marconi; Barbara Franca Simonetti; Gian Marco Giuseppetti; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.