Literature DB >> 9097051

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

S H Heywang-Köbrunner1, P Viehweg, A Heinig, C Küchler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast has been one of the most controversial areas of MRI. Even though most investigators have, in selected indications, been able to improve accuracy by the additional use of contrast-enhanced MRI, its abuse has been feared not only because of increased costs for imaging, but also because of increased biopsy rates caused by false positive calls and because of errors caused by insufficient standardisation. In this article an overview is given of the present knowledge about contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Factors that influence the accuracy and reproducibility of contrast-enhanced MRI are analysed.
METHOD: Factors that influence accuracy include: (1) technical factors that influence accuracy, e.g. slice thickness (partial volume effect), motion reduction, reduction of (cardiac) artifacts, dosage of contrast agent, choice of pulse sequence and echotime, and choice of the method for elimination of fat signal. (2) Hormonal factors (timing of the examination with reference to the menstrual cycle, hormonal replacement therapy). They influence accuracy and must be taken into account. (3) Interpretation guidelines-their choice influences sensitivity and specificity mostly inversely and the use of information from conventional imaging appears necessary. (4) Patient selection influences accuracy for statistical and for biological reasons.
RESULTS: Based on the present literature and on the experiences gathered in six German universities (> 12000 examinations) an excellent sensitivity (> 98%) can be achieved for the combination of mammography and MRI. However, specificity strongly varies with the indications. Recommended indications include examination of breasts with impaired evaluation due to severe scarring, after silicon implants and in the dense breast, exclusion of multicentricity and search for primary tumor. Indications under investigation include high risk patients and strictly selected problem cases.
CONCLUSION: If appropriately applied and used for selected indications, contrast-enhanced MRI may allow a significant diagnostic gain. In order to take advantage of the full potentials of contrast-enhanced MRI the development of commercially available biopsy coils is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9097051     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01142-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  60 in total

1.  Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning.

Authors:  Ansgar Malich; Mirjam Facius; Roselle Anderson; Joachim Böttcher; Dieter Sauner; Andreas Hansch; Christiane Marx; Alexander Petrovitch; Stefan Pfleiderer; Werner Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development and characterization of a dynamic lesion phantom for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Prasanna Hariharan; Matthew R Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification.

Authors:  Shannon C Agner; Salil Soman; Edward Libfeld; Margie McDonald; Kathleen Thomas; Sarah Englander; Mark A Rosen; Deanna Chin; John Nosher; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Yogesh K Mariappan; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

6.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Can unenhanced breast MRI be used to decrease negative biopsy rates?

Authors:  Sibel Kul; Şükrü Oğuz; İlker Eyüboğlu; Özlem Kömürcüoğlu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Application and assessment of a robust elastic motion correction algorithm to dynamic MRI.

Authors:  K-H Herrmann; S Wurdinger; D R Fischer; I Krumbein; M Schmitt; G Hermosillo; K Chaudhuri; A Krishnan; M Salganicoff; W A Kaiser; J R Reichenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography?

Authors:  D R Fischer; P Baltzer; A Malich; S Wurdinger; M G Freesmeyer; C Marx; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.