Literature DB >> 22128131

Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

I Millet1, E Pages, D Hoa, S Merigeaud, F Curros Doyon, X Prat, P Taourel.   

Abstract

At our academic institution, we have noticed repeated examples of both false-positive and false-negative MR diagnoses in breast cancer. The most common diagnostic errors in interpreting MRI of the breast are discussed in this review and experience-based advice is provided to avoid similar mistakes. The most common reasons for false-positive diagnoses are misinterpretation of artefacts, confusion between normal enhancing structures and tumours and, above all, insufficient use of the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon, whereas false-negative diagnoses are made as a result of missed tiny enhancement, a background-enhancing breast, or enhancement interpreted as benign rather than malignant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22128131      PMCID: PMC3473994          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/47213729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  50 in total

1.  The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Carla Boetes; Jeroen Veltman; Lya van Die; Peter Bult; Theo Wobbes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Ingo B Runnebaum; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Enhancement of intramammary lymph nodes with lymphoid hyperplasia: a potential pitfall in breast MRI.

Authors:  X Gallardo; M Sentís; E Castañer; X Andreu; A Darnell; J Canalías
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI.

Authors:  Susanne Wurdinger; Aimée B Herzog; Dorothee R Fischer; Christiane Marx; Gerd Raabe; Achim Schneider; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T.

Authors:  Andrea Teifke; Alexander Hlawatsch; Thomas Beier; Toni Werner Vomweg; Simin Schadmand; Markus Schmidt; Hans-Anton Lehr; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging findings in women treated with toremifene for premenstrual mastalgia.

Authors:  S Oksa; R Parkkola; T Luukkaala; J Mäenpää
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Assessment of false-negative cases of breast MR imaging in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Inge-Marie A Obdeijn; Claudette E Loo; Adriana J Rijnsburger; Martin N J M Wasser; Elisabeth Bergers; Theo Kok; Jan G M Klijn; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging features of fibrocystic change of the breast.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Hui Liu; Hyeon-Man Baek; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  12 in total

1.  Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography?

Authors:  Rasha M Kamal; Maha H Helal; Sahar M Mansour; Marwa A Haggag; Omniya M Nada; Iman G Farahat; Nelly H Alieldin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Melanie Freed; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Jin Zhang; Claudia Seuss; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Does background parenchymal enhancement on MRI affect the rate of positive resection margin in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  S Y Park; D K Kang; T H Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Tali Amir; Molly P Hogan; Stefanie Jacobs; Varadan Sevilimedu; Janice Sung; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Intramammary Findings on CT of the Chest - a Review of Normal Anatomy and Possible Findings.

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02

6.  The correlation of background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral breast with patient and tumor characteristics of MRI-screen detected breast cancers.

Authors:  Suzan Vreemann; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Cristina Borelli; Peter Bult; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Breast Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI: Fibrocystic Changes Presenting as a Non-mass Enhancement Mimicking Malignancy.

Authors:  Zorica C Milosevic; Mirjan M Nadrljanski; Zorka M Milovanovic; Nina Z Gusic; Slavko S Vucicevic; Olga S Radulovic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  MRI texture analysis in differentiating luminal A and luminal B breast cancer molecular subtypes - a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Annukka Salminen; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Ilkka Koskivuo; Nina Brück; Pia Boström; Riitta Parkkola
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Kang; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Hye Mi Gweon; Na Lae Eun; Kyung Hee Ko; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Large Non-enhancing Breast Cancer on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Report.

Authors:  Johannes Peters; Wei Che Tsai; Gudrun Peters
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.