Literature DB >> 27749476

Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.

Carmit K McMullen1, Joanna E Bulkley, Andrea Altschuler, Christopher S Wendel, Marcia Grant, Mark C Hornbrook, Virginia Sun, Robert S Krouse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors.
DESIGN: This was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS: A survey was mailed to long-term (≥5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted χ values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category.
RESULTS: The survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare-eligible population), and non-English-speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27749476      PMCID: PMC5226258          DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  29 in total

1.  The health-related quality of life in long-term colorectal cancer survivors study: objectives, methods and patient sample.

Authors:  M Jane Mohler; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 2.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

3.  Current unmet needs of cancer survivors: analysis of open-ended responses to the American Cancer Society Study of Cancer Survivors II.

Authors:  Mary Ann Burg; Gail Adorno; Ellen D S Lopez; Victoria Loerzel; Kevin Stein; Cara Wallace; Dinghy Kristine B Sharma
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment.

Authors:  A Zolciak; K Bujko; L Kepka; J Oledzki; A Rutkowski; M P Nowacki
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tenbroeck Smith; Kevin D Stein; C Christina Mehta; Chiewkwei Kaw; James L Kepner; Trent Buskirk; Jeremy Stafford; Frank Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.

Authors:  G Godin; R J Shephard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-09

7.  Revision and psychometric testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire.

Authors:  Marcia Grant; Betty Ferrell; Grace Dean; Gwen Uman; David Chu; Robert Krouse
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Follow-up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Pamela B Mangu; Patrick J Flynn; Larissa Korde; Charles L Loprinzi; Bruce D Minsky; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kim Ryan; Deborah H Schrag; Sandra L Wong; Al B Benson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex.

Authors:  Robert S Krouse; Lisa J Herrinton; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Sylvan B Green; M Jane Mohler; Carol M Baldwin; Carmit K McMullen; Susan M Rawl; Eric Matayoshi; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12 to 36 months after diagnosis.

Authors:  Amy Downing; Eva J A Morris; Mike Richards; Jessica Corner; Penny Wright; David Sebag-Montefiore; Paul Finan; Paul Kind; Charlotte Wood; Sarah Lawton; Richard Feltbower; Richard Wagland; Sally Vernon; James Thomas; Adam W Glaser
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  15 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Unmet Needs in Colorectal Cancer Survivors After Treatment for Curative Intent.

Authors:  Joceline Vuong-Thu Vu; Niki Matusko; Samantha Hendren; Scott E Regenbogen; Karin M Hardiman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Mental Health Disorders are More Common in Colorectal Cancer Survivors and Associated With Decreased Overall Survival.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; David Baraghoshi; Randa Tao; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Glynn W Gilcrease; Jonathan Whisenant; John R Weis; Courtney Scaife; Thomas B Pickron; Lyen C Huang; Marcus M Monroe; Sarah Abdelaziz; Alison M Fraser; Ken R Smith; Vikrant Deshmukh; Michael Newman; Kerry G Rowe; John Snyder; Niloy J Samadder; Mia Hashibe
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Ongoing ostomy self-care challenges of long-term rectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Authors:  Anne Reb; Nora Ruel; Marwan Fakih; Lily Lai; Ravi Salgia; Betty Ferrell; Sagus Sampath; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 5.  Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  An-Sofie Verrijssen; José Guillem; Rodrigo Perez; Krzysztof Bujko; Nathalie Guedj; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ruud Houben; Danny Goudkade; Jarno Melenhorst; Jeroen Buijsen; Ben Vanneste; Heike I Grabsch; Murillo Bellezzo; Gabriel Paiva Fonseca; Frank Verhaegen; Maaike Berbee; Evert J Van Limbergen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Sexual Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Rectal Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Cancer survivors' challenges with ostomy appliances and self-management: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Octavio Bojorquez; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Ronald Weinstein; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Health care improvement and survivorship priorities of colorectal cancer survivors: findings from the PORTAL colorectal cancer cohort survey.

Authors:  Carmit McMullen; Joanna Bulkley; Douglas A Corley; Sarah Madrid; Anjelica Q Davis; Rose Hesselbrock; Florence Kurtilla; Charles K Anderson; David Arterburn; Carol P Somkin; Pamala A Pawloski; Nirupa R Ghai; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The association of bowel function, participation in life activities, and quality of life in rectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Andreea M Rawlings; Robert S Krouse; Melanie C Francisco; Andrew T Sterrett; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Pamala A Pawloski; Douglas A Corley; Janice C Colwell; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Ostomy telehealth for cancer survivors: Design of the Ostomy Self-management Training (OSMT) randomized trial.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Elizabeth Ercolano; Ruth McCorkle; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Nancy J Tallman; Frank Passero; Sabreen Raza; Zuleyha Cidav; Michael Holcomb; Ronald S Weinstein; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.