BACKGROUND: With improving survival from colorectal cancer, there is a growing population of patients undergoing surveillance. National accreditation organizations have increasingly endorsed formal survivorship care planning. To effectively design patient-centered survivorship programs, an understanding of the prevalence of unmet psychosocial and symptomatic needs is required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to understand the breadth of unmet needs among survivors of colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing surveillance after curative-intent therapy for colorectal cancer. SETTING: This study was conducted June 2017 to January 2018 at an academic cancer center. PATIENTS: There were 99 patients (58 with colon cancer, 41 with rectal cancer). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured patient-reported unmet needs by using a modification of the Cancer Survivor Unmet Needs instrument, within domains of emotional (stress, concerns about recurrence), relationship (fertility, interpersonal), logistical (need for accessible parking, case management), financial, treatment-related (neuropathy, bowel function), and surveillance-related needs. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age was 58 (±12), and the time from diagnosis was 34 (±18) months. Overall, 74% of patients reported at least one unmet need, 49% reported emotional needs, 24% relationship needs, 24% financial needs, 25% logistical needs, and 33% surveillance needs. Thirty-six (62%) patients with colon cancer and 37 (90%) patients with rectal cancer reported at least one ongoing problem (p = 0.002). Thirty-five (82%) patients with rectal cancer reported an unmet treatment-related need in comparison with 23 (40%) patients with colon cancer (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) number of ongoing needs were 1 (0-5) in patients with colon cancer and 4 (2-8) in patients with rectal cancer (p = 0.007). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size and lack of generalizability, given the tertiary care setting. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of colorectal cancer survivors reported unmet needs years after completion of curative-intent therapy. Patients with rectal cancer were significantly more likely to have unmet needs and may benefit from additional care during survivorship. Colorectal cancer survivorship programs should incorporate psychosocial and symptomatic care in addition to cancer surveillance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A885.
BACKGROUND: With improving survival from colorectal cancer, there is a growing population of patients undergoing surveillance. National accreditation organizations have increasingly endorsed formal survivorship care planning. To effectively design patient-centered survivorship programs, an understanding of the prevalence of unmet psychosocial and symptomatic needs is required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to understand the breadth of unmet needs among survivors of colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing surveillance after curative-intent therapy for colorectal cancer. SETTING: This study was conducted June 2017 to January 2018 at an academic cancer center. PATIENTS: There were 99 patients (58 with colon cancer, 41 with rectal cancer). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured patient-reported unmet needs by using a modification of the Cancer Survivor Unmet Needs instrument, within domains of emotional (stress, concerns about recurrence), relationship (fertility, interpersonal), logistical (need for accessible parking, case management), financial, treatment-related (neuropathy, bowel function), and surveillance-related needs. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age was 58 (±12), and the time from diagnosis was 34 (±18) months. Overall, 74% of patients reported at least one unmet need, 49% reported emotional needs, 24% relationship needs, 24% financial needs, 25% logistical needs, and 33% surveillance needs. Thirty-six (62%) patients with colon cancer and 37 (90%) patients with rectal cancer reported at least one ongoing problem (p = 0.002). Thirty-five (82%) patients with rectal cancer reported an unmet treatment-related need in comparison with 23 (40%) patients with colon cancer (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) number of ongoing needs were 1 (0-5) in patients with colon cancer and 4 (2-8) in patients with rectal cancer (p = 0.007). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size and lack of generalizability, given the tertiary care setting. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of colorectal cancer survivors reported unmet needs years after completion of curative-intent therapy. Patients with rectal cancer were significantly more likely to have unmet needs and may benefit from additional care during survivorship. Colorectal cancer survivorship programs should incorporate psychosocial and symptomatic care in addition to cancer surveillance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A885.
Authors: Christine M Veenstra; Scott E Regenbogen; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Abrahamse; Mousumi Banerjee; Arden M Morris Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Dec 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Valery E P P Lemmens; Harm J T Rutten; Jan A Roukema; Hendrik Martijn; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Emily Chan; Yi-Jen Chen; Harry S Cooper; Paul F Engstrom; Peter C Enzinger; Moon J Fenton; Charles S Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S Hochster; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Wells A Messersmith; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Eric Rohren; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Kristina M Gregory; Deborah Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Virginia Sun; Marcia Grant; Carmit K McMullen; Andrea Altschuler; M Jane Mohler; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Carol M Baldwin; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: Yuda Chongpison; Mark C Hornbrook; Robin B Harris; Lisa J Herrinton; Joe K Gerald; Marcia Grant; Joanna E Bulkley; Christopher S Wendel; Robert S Krouse Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Khaled El-Shami; Kevin C Oeffinger; Nicole L Erb; Anne Willis; Jennifer K Bretsch; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Rachel S Cannady; Sandra L Wong; Johnie Rose; April L Barbour; Kevin D Stein; Katherine B Sharpe; Durado D Brooks; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ibrahim Azar; Nada Al Masalmeh; Saghi Esfandiarifard; Gurjiwan Virk; Wissam Kiwan; Anthony Frank Shields; Syed Mehdi; Philip A Philip Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Jacob Rosenberg; Birthe Thing Oggesen; Marie Louise Sjødin Hamberg; Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Anne C M Cuijpers; Tim Lubbers; Heleen A van Rens; Valerie Smit-Fun; Christel Gielen; Kim Reynders; Merel L Kimman; Laurents P S Stassen Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Hallie Dau; Abdollah Safari; Khalid Saad El Din; Helen McTaggart-Cowan; Jonathan M Loree; Sharlene Gill; Mary A De Vera Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.430