Virginia Sun1, Marcia Grant2, Christopher S Wendel3, Carmit K McMullen4, Joanna E Bulkley4, Lisa J Herrinton5, Mark C Hornbrook4, Robert S Krouse3. 1. Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. Electronic address: vsun@coh.org. 2. Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. 3. Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA. 4. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction is a treatment sequela in survivors of rectal cancer (RC). Differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) can occur based on ostomy status (permanent ostomy vs anastomosis). AIM: To describe alterations in sexual function and HRQOL based on ostomy status in long-term (≥5 years) survivors of RC. METHODS: Survivors of RC with an ostomy (n = 181) or anastomosis (n = 394) were surveyed using validated HRQOL and functional status tools. We compared sexuality outcomes between the ostomy and anastomosis groups and reported differences adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Qualitative data from one open-ended question on survivors' greatest challenges since their surgery were analyzed to explore sexuality, symptoms, and relationships. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether sexually active, satisfaction with sexual activity, and select sexual dysfunction items from the Modified City of Hope Quality of Life-Colorectal. RESULTS: Survivors with a permanent ostomy were more likely to have been sexually inactive after surgery if it occurred before 2000 and experience dissatisfaction with appearance, interference with personal relationships and intimacy, and lower overall HRQOL. Female survivors of RC with an ostomy were more likely to have problems with vaginal strictures and vaginal pain after surgery that persisted at the time of the survey (≥5 years later). Radiation treatment, tumor stage, soilage of garments in bed, and higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores were negatively associated with outcomes. Six qualitative themes emerged: loss of and decreased sexual activity, psychological issues with sexual activity, physical issues with sexual activity, partner rejection, ostomy interference with sexual activity, and positive experiences with sexuality. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction is a common long-term sequela of RC treatment, with more problems observed in survivors with a permanent ostomy. This warrants widespread implementation of targeted interventions to manage sexual dysfunction and improve HRQOL for these survivors.
INTRODUCTION:Sexual dysfunction is a treatment sequela in survivors of rectal cancer (RC). Differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) can occur based on ostomy status (permanent ostomy vs anastomosis). AIM: To describe alterations in sexual function and HRQOL based on ostomy status in long-term (≥5 years) survivors of RC. METHODS: Survivors of RC with an ostomy (n = 181) or anastomosis (n = 394) were surveyed using validated HRQOL and functional status tools. We compared sexuality outcomes between the ostomy and anastomosis groups and reported differences adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Qualitative data from one open-ended question on survivors' greatest challenges since their surgery were analyzed to explore sexuality, symptoms, and relationships. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether sexually active, satisfaction with sexual activity, and select sexual dysfunction items from the Modified City of Hope Quality of Life-Colorectal. RESULTS: Survivors with a permanent ostomy were more likely to have been sexually inactive after surgery if it occurred before 2000 and experience dissatisfaction with appearance, interference with personal relationships and intimacy, and lower overall HRQOL. Female survivors of RC with an ostomy were more likely to have problems with vaginal strictures and vaginal pain after surgery that persisted at the time of the survey (≥5 years later). Radiation treatment, tumor stage, soilage of garments in bed, and higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores were negatively associated with outcomes. Six qualitative themes emerged: loss of and decreased sexual activity, psychological issues with sexual activity, physical issues with sexual activity, partner rejection, ostomy interference with sexual activity, and positive experiences with sexuality. CONCLUSION:Sexual dysfunction is a common long-term sequela of RC treatment, with more problems observed in survivors with a permanent ostomy. This warrants widespread implementation of targeted interventions to manage sexual dysfunction and improve HRQOL for these survivors.
Authors: M Jane Mohler; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Corrie A M Marijnen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Hein Putter; Mandy van den Brink; Cornelis P Maas; Hendrik Martijn; Harm J Rutten; Theo Wiggers; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Jan-Willem H Leer; Anne M Stiggelbout Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Larissa K Temple; Jennifer Bacik; Salvatore G Savatta; Lester Gottesman; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; José G Guillem; Bruce D Minsky; Michelle Kalman; Howard T Thaler; Deborah Schrag; W Douglas Wong Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Abdelkarim S Allal; Pascal Gervaz; Philippe Gertsch; Jacques Bernier; Arnaud D Roth; Philippe Morel; Sabine Bieri Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Barbara Given; Charles W Given; Alla Sikorskii; Sangchoon Jeon; Ruth McCorkle; Victoria Champion; David Decker Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2007-12-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Michelle R Symms; Susan M Rawl; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Stephen Joel Coons; Sara Hickey; Carol M Baldwin; Robert S Krouse Journal: Clin Nurse Spec Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.067
Authors: Carmit K McMullen; Mark C Hornbrook; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Christopher S Wendel; M Jane Mohler; Andrea Altschuler; Michelle Ramirez; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2008-04
Authors: Susanne Merkel; Klaus Weber; Maximilian Brunner; Justus Baecker; Abbas Agaimy; Jonas Göhl; Werner Hohenberger; Vera Schellerer; Robert Grützmann Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: J Segelman; C Buchli; A Svanström Röjvall; P Matthiessen; S Arver; M Bottai; M Ahlberg; R Jasuja; A Flöter-Rådestad; A Martling Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Virginia Sun; Elizabeth Ercolano; Ruth McCorkle; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Nancy J Tallman; Frank Passero; Sabreen Raza; Zuleyha Cidav; Michael Holcomb; Ronald S Weinstein; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Nicola B Dames; Sarah E Squire; Anthony B Devlin; Rebecca Fish; Carly Nichola Bisset; Phil Tozer Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 3.917