Anne Reb1, Nora Ruel2, Marwan Fakih3, Lily Lai4, Ravi Salgia3, Betty Ferrell1, Sagus Sampath5, Jae Y Kim6, Dan J Raz6, Virginia Sun7. 1. Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 2. Biostatistics Core, Department of Information Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 3. Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 4. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 6. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. 7. Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. Electronic address: vsun@coh.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning (SM-SCP) intervention in colorectal and lung cancer survivors. METHODS: This is a single-group, pre- and post-mixed methods study of an advance practice nurse-driven survivorship care intervention that integrates a survivorship care plan with self-management skills coaching. Colorectal and lung cancer survivors with stage I-III disease were enrolled at 3-6 months after completing treatments, and the intervention was administered in one in-person or telephone session. Survivor outcome measures included depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, QOL, and satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used for exploratory evaluations of pre-to post-intervention score changes. Content analysis was conducted to analyze the qualitative data to describe survivors' experience with the intervention. RESULTS: Thirty participants (15 colorectal, 15 lung) enrolled and completed the study (73% retention). It took an average of 40 min to complete the TS/CP and 34.2 min to deliver the intervention. Exploratory analysis revealed significant differences from baseline to post-intervention in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, physical functioning, role limitations-physical, pain, general health, health transition, physical health summary, and total QOL. Three qualitative themes emerged: 1) Feeling empowered about having a plan; 2) Struggling with psychosocial concerns; and 3) Suggestions for intervention content and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The SM-SCP intervention was feasible and acceptable for colorectal and lung cancer survivors after treatment completion. Survivorship care interventions have potential to fulfill the unmet needs of colorectal and lung cancer survivors. Their effectiveness might be greater by integrating conceptually-based models of care, such as self-management skills building.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning (SM-SCP) intervention in colorectal and lung cancer survivors. METHODS: This is a single-group, pre- and post-mixed methods study of an advance practice nurse-driven survivorship care intervention that integrates a survivorship care plan with self-management skills coaching. Colorectal and lung cancer survivors with stage I-III disease were enrolled at 3-6 months after completing treatments, and the intervention was administered in one in-person or telephone session. Survivor outcome measures included depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, QOL, and satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used for exploratory evaluations of pre-to post-intervention score changes. Content analysis was conducted to analyze the qualitative data to describe survivors' experience with the intervention. RESULTS: Thirty participants (15 colorectal, 15 lung) enrolled and completed the study (73% retention). It took an average of 40 min to complete the TS/CP and 34.2 min to deliver the intervention. Exploratory analysis revealed significant differences from baseline to post-intervention in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, physical functioning, role limitations-physical, pain, general health, health transition, physical health summary, and total QOL. Three qualitative themes emerged: 1) Feeling empowered about having a plan; 2) Struggling with psychosocial concerns; and 3) Suggestions for intervention content and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The SM-SCP intervention was feasible and acceptable for colorectal and lung cancer survivors after treatment completion. Survivorship care interventions have potential to fulfill the unmet needs of colorectal and lung cancer survivors. Their effectiveness might be greater by integrating conceptually-based models of care, such as self-management skills building.
Authors: Kelly M Kenzik; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle Y Martin; Laura Petersen; Ron D Hays; Neeraj Arora; Maria Pisu Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Virginia Sun; Marcia Grant; Carmit K McMullen; Andrea Altschuler; M Jane Mohler; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Carol M Baldwin; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Virginia W Norris; Victoria S Blinder; Bruce A Cutter; Michael T Halpern; Jennifer Malin; Michael N Neuss; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Tari D Topolski; James LoGerfo; Donald L Patrick; Barbara Williams; Julie Walwick; Marsha B Patrick Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Sarah A Birken; Robin Urquhart; Corrine Munoz-Plaza; Alexandra R Zizzi; Emily Haines; Angela Stover; Deborah K Mayer; Erin E Hahn Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-25
Authors: Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-25
Authors: Charlotte IJsbrandy; Petronella B Ottevanger; Winald R Gerritsen; Wim H van Harten; Rosella P M G Hermens Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Kelly J Lafaro; Dan J Raz; Jae Y Kim; Sherry Hite; Nora Ruel; Gouri Varatkar; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Laleh Melstrom; Byrne Lee; Gagandeep Singh; Yuman Fong; Virginia Sun Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Stephanie J Sohl; Deanna Befus; Janet A Tooze; Beverly Levine; Shannon L Golden; Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega; Boris C Pasche; Kathryn E Weaver; Kristen Hassmiller Lich Journal: Psychol Health Date: 2021-09-27