PURPOSE: Ostomies may be performed for bowel or urinary diversion, and occur in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Impact on physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being is not unexpected, but has been minimally described in the literature. The City of Hope Quality of Life (COH-QOL)-Ostomy Questionnaire is an adult patient self-report instrument designed to assess quality of life. This report focuses on the revision and psychometric testing of this questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The revised COH-QOL-Ostomy Questionnaire involved in-depth patient interviews and expert panel review. The format consisted of a 13-item disease and demographic section, a 34-item forced-choice section, and a 41-item linear analogue scaled section. A mailed survey to California members of the United Ostomy Association resulted in a 62% response rate (n = 1513). Factor analysis was conducted to refine the instrument. Construct validity involved testing a number of hypotheses identifying contrasting groups. RESULTS: Factor analysis confirmed the conceptual framework. Reliability of subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.90. The questionnaire discriminated between subpopulations with specific concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the analyses provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the COH-QOL-Ostomy Questionnaire as a comprehensive, multidimensional self-report questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with intestinal ostomies.
PURPOSE: Ostomies may be performed for bowel or urinary diversion, and occur in both cancer and non-cancerpatients. Impact on physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being is not unexpected, but has been minimally described in the literature. The City of Hope Quality of Life (COH-QOL)-Ostomy Questionnaire is an adult patient self-report instrument designed to assess quality of life. This report focuses on the revision and psychometric testing of this questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The revised COH-QOL-Ostomy Questionnaire involved in-depth patient interviews and expert panel review. The format consisted of a 13-item disease and demographic section, a 34-item forced-choice section, and a 41-item linear analogue scaled section. A mailed survey to California members of the United Ostomy Association resulted in a 62% response rate (n = 1513). Factor analysis was conducted to refine the instrument. Construct validity involved testing a number of hypotheses identifying contrasting groups. RESULTS: Factor analysis confirmed the conceptual framework. Reliability of subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.90. The questionnaire discriminated between subpopulations with specific concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the analyses provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the COH-QOL-Ostomy Questionnaire as a comprehensive, multidimensional self-report questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with intestinal ostomies.
Authors: Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Luke L Bui; Linda Last; Holly Bradley; Calvin H L Law; Barbara-Anne Maier; Andrew J Smith Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: M Jane Mohler; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Marcia Grant; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Virginia Sun; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea Altschuler; Michelle Ramirez; Carol M Baldwin; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Christopher S Wendel; Stephen Joel Coons; Marcia Grant; Lisa J Herrinton; M Jane Mohler; Carol M Baldwin; Carmit K McMullen; Sylvan B Green; Andrea Altschuler; Susan M Rawl; Robert S Krouse Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Martha D Cobb; Nancy J Tallman; Janice Colwell; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth Ercolano; Marcia Grant; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Judith H Hibbard; Robert S Krouse Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Virginia Sun; Marcia Grant; Carmit K McMullen; Andrea Altschuler; M Jane Mohler; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Carol M Baldwin; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: Liyan Liu; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Carol M Baldwin; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa J Herrinton; Carmit McMullen; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Andrea Altschuler; Michelle Ramirez; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Lisa Herrinton; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.741