Joanna E Bulkley1, Carmit K McMullen2, Andreea M Rawlings2, Robert S Krouse3, Melanie C Francisco2, Andrew T Sterrett4, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman4, Pamala A Pawloski5, Douglas A Corley6, Janice C Colwell7, Heather Spencer Feigelson4. 1. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA. Joanna.E.Bulkley@kpchr.org. 2. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Kaiser Permanente Institute of Health Research, Denver, CO, USA. 5. HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA. 6. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA. 7. University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether limited participation in life activities is associated with quality of life (QOL) in rectal cancer survivors, and if so, whether this association is independent of bowel function difficulties. METHODS: We surveyed rectal cancer survivors from four healthcare systems about their QOL, bowel function, and participation in life activities. Additional demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the electronic health record. We examined independent associations between bowel function, participation in life activities, and QOL, controlling for potential confounders. We also identified factors, including ostomy status, that correlate with participation in life activities. RESULTS: Of the 527 respondents, 52% were male, 80% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 63. In fully adjusted models for all rectal cancer survivors, participation in life activities was positively associated with QOL, while bowel function was not. Bowel function retained an independent association with QOL for those who previously had an ostomy and were therefore more likely to have a low rectal anastomosis. Lower participation in life activities was correlated with lower self-reported physical and cognitive function, younger age, financial difficulty, and being non-Hispanic white. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer survivors' participation in life activities was strongly associated with QOL, even when controlling for numerous confounders, including bowel function. Identifying ways to improve participation in life activities may be critical to developing rehabilitative and other supportive interventions that optimize QOL among rectal cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether limited participation in life activities is associated with quality of life (QOL) in rectal cancer survivors, and if so, whether this association is independent of bowel function difficulties. METHODS: We surveyed rectal cancer survivors from four healthcare systems about their QOL, bowel function, and participation in life activities. Additional demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the electronic health record. We examined independent associations between bowel function, participation in life activities, and QOL, controlling for potential confounders. We also identified factors, including ostomy status, that correlate with participation in life activities. RESULTS: Of the 527 respondents, 52% were male, 80% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 63. In fully adjusted models for all rectal cancer survivors, participation in life activities was positively associated with QOL, while bowel function was not. Bowel function retained an independent association with QOL for those who previously had an ostomy and were therefore more likely to have a low rectal anastomosis. Lower participation in life activities was correlated with lower self-reported physical and cognitive function, younger age, financial difficulty, and being non-Hispanic white. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer survivors' participation in life activities was strongly associated with QOL, even when controlling for numerous confounders, including bowel function. Identifying ways to improve participation in life activities may be critical to developing rehabilitative and other supportive interventions that optimize QOL among rectal cancer survivors.
Authors: M G Guren; M T Eriksen; J N Wiig; E Carlsen; A Nesbakken; H K Sigurdsson; A Wibe; K M Tveit Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea Altschuler; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Robert S Krouse Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Liyan Liu; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Robert S Krouse Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Marilyne M Lange; Joseph E Martz; Beverly Ramdeen; Vicki Brooks; Kwadwo Boachie-Adjei; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Warren E Enker Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Robert S Krouse; Lisa J Herrinton; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Sylvan B Green; M Jane Mohler; Carol M Baldwin; Carmit K McMullen; Susan M Rawl; Eric Matayoshi; Stephen Joel Coons; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmit McMullen; Joanna Bulkley; Douglas A Corley; Sarah Madrid; Anjelica Q Davis; Rose Hesselbrock; Florence Kurtilla; Charles K Anderson; David Arterburn; Carol P Somkin; Pamala A Pawloski; Nirupa R Ghai; Heather Spencer Feigelson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 3.603