Literature DB >> 2769313

Evaluation of a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitor in obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

R H Epstein1, S Kaplan, B L Leighton, M C Norris, C A DeSimone.   

Abstract

A noninvasive blood pressure monitor (Finapres) that continuously displays the arterial waveform using the Penaz methodology has recently been introduced into clinical practice. We compared this device with an automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (Dinamap 1846SX) in 20 patients during spinal anesthesia for nonemergency cesarean section according to a procedure suggested by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. After administration of the spinal anesthetic, the Finapres monitor produced systolic, mean, and diastolic pressure measurements greater than those of the Dinamap monitor (6.6 +/- 12.5, 3.3 +/- 10.4, and 7.2 +/- 9.8 mm Hg, respectively). In most patients, the Finapres measurements were similar to those determined by the Dinamap; however, in 4 patients, mean systolic differences were greater than 20 mm Hg. These patients did not differ from the others in age, height, weight, or baseline blood pressure, and the pressure values recorded by the Finapres monitor were substantially higher than those measured by auscultation in the labor room. In 30% of the patients, the offset between Dinamap and Finapres blood pressure measurements changed markedly over the course of the surgical procedure. The Finapres monitor occasionally stopped working and had to be restarted. In 1 patient (not included in this analysis), the Dinamap monitor was unable to determine the blood pressure due to patient shivering; this did not appear to interfere with the Finapres. We conclude that the Finapres monitor does not consistently provide blood pressure information equivalent to that of the Dinamap in obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769313     DOI: 10.1007/BF01627447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  9 in total

1.  Continuous, real-time, noninvasive monitor of blood pressure: Penaz methodology applied to the finger.

Authors:  R D Boehmer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

2.  Invasive v. non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure. Comparison of two automatic methods and simultaneously measured direct intra-arterial pressure.

Authors:  J van Egmond; M Hasenbos; J F Crul
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Comparing direct and indirect arterial blood pressures.

Authors:  P G Loubser
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Method of ephedrine administration and nausea and hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  S Datta; M H Alper; G W Ostheimer; J B Weiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Comparison of direct and indirect measuring arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  J M Bruner; L J Krenis; J M Kunsman; A P Sherman
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

6.  Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger.

Authors:  N T Smith; K H Wesseling; B de Wit
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1985-01

7.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

8.  Effects of peripheral vasoconstriction on the blood pressure in the finger, measured continuously by a new noninvasive method (the Finapres).

Authors:  J C Dorlas; J A Nijboer; W T Butijn; G M van der Hoeven; J J Settels; K H Wesseling
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Noninvasive continuous blood pressure measurement from the finger: optimal measurement conditions and factors affecting reliability.

Authors:  T Kurki; N T Smith; N Head; H Dec-Silver; A Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-01
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparative accuracies of a finger blood pressure monitor and an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.

Authors:  R H Epstein; S Huffnagle; R R Bartkowski
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-04

2.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring of tachycardic episodes during interventional electrophysiology.

Authors:  Roberto Maggi; Valentina Viscardi; Toshiyuki Furukawa; Michele Brignole
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Comparison of intraarterial with continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement in postoperative pediatric patients.

Authors:  J K Triedman; J P Saul
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.