Literature DB >> 27668486

Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

David J M Kraemer1, Victor R Schinazi1, Philip B Cawkwell1, Anand Tekriwal1, Russell A Epstein1, Sharon L Thompson-Schill1.   

Abstract

Using novel virtual cities, we investigated the influence of verbal and visual strategies on the encoding of navigation-relevant information in a large-scale virtual environment. In 2 experiments, participants watched videos of routes through 4 virtual cities and were subsequently tested on their memory for observed landmarks and their ability to make judgments regarding the relative directions of the different landmarks along the route. In the first experiment, self-report questionnaires measuring visual and verbal cognitive styles were administered to examine correlations between cognitive styles, landmark recognition, and judgments of relative direction. Results demonstrate a tradeoff in which the verbal cognitive style is more beneficial for recognizing individual landmarks than for judging relative directions between them, whereas the visual cognitive style is more beneficial for judging relative directions than for landmark recognition. In a second experiment, we manipulated the use of verbal and visual strategies by varying task instructions given to separate groups of participants. Results confirm that a verbal strategy benefits landmark memory, whereas a visual strategy benefits judgments of relative direction. The manipulation of strategy by altering task instructions appears to trump individual differences in cognitive style. Taken together, we find that processing different details during route encoding, whether due to individual proclivities (Experiment 1) or task instructions (Experiment 2), results in benefits for different components of navigation-relevant information. These findings also highlight the value of considering multiple sources of individual differences as part of spatial cognition investigations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27668486      PMCID: PMC5366277          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  44 in total

1.  Processing approaches to cognition: the impetus from the levels-of-processing framework.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; David A Gallo; Lisa Geraci
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

2.  Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style.

Authors:  Maria Kozhevnikov; Stephen Kosslyn; Jennifer Shephard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; J Stephen Higgins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.

Authors:  Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Sources of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language.

Authors:  L Hermer-Vazquez; E S Spelke; A S Katsnelson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Functional-anatomic correlates of individual differences in memory.

Authors:  Brenda A Kirchhoff; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  What determines our navigational abilities?

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Human spatial representation: insights from animals.

Authors:  Ranxiao Wang; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid.

Authors:  J W Schooler; T Y Engstler-Schooler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Semantic elaboration in auditory and visual spatial memory.

Authors:  Meghan Taevs; Louisa Dahmani; Robert J Zatorre; Véronique D Bohbot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-30
View more
  7 in total

1.  How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!

Authors:  Alessia Bocchi; Marco Giancola; Laura Piccardi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Raffaella Nori; Simonetta D'Amico
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning.

Authors:  Justin C Hayes; David J M Kraemer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Evaluation of a conceptual framework for predicting navigation performance in virtual reality.

Authors:  Jascha Grübel; Tyler Thrash; Christoph Hölscher; Victor R Schinazi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Identifying the cognitive processes underpinning hippocampal-dependent tasks.

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Victoria Hotchin; Anna Monk; Gloria Pizzamiglio; Alice Liefgreen; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-03-04

5.  Behavioural and cognitive mechanisms of Developmental Topographical Disorientation.

Authors:  Ford Burles; Giuseppe Iaria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Individual differences in mental imagery modulate effective connectivity of scene-selective regions during resting state.

Authors:  Maria Giulia Tullo; Hannes Almgren; Frederik Van de Steen; Valentina Sulpizio; Daniele Marinazzo; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.