Literature DB >> 16997905

Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition.

Russell A Epstein1, J Stephen Higgins.   

Abstract

Human observers can quickly and accurately interpret the meaning of complex visual scenes. The neural mechanisms underlying this ability are largely unexplored. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure cortical activity while subjects identified briefly presented scenes as specific familiar locations ("Houston Hall"), general place categories ("kitchen"), or general situational categories ("party"). Scene-responsive voxels in the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) were highly sensitive to recognition level when identifying scenes, responding more strongly during location identification than during place category or situation identification. In contrast, the superior temporal sulcus, cingulate sulcus, and supermarginal gyrus displayed the opposite pattern, responding more strongly during place category and situation identification. Consideration of results from 4 experiments suggests that the PPA represents the visuospatial structure of individual scenes, whereas RSC supports processes that allow scenes to be localized within a larger extended environment. These results suggest that different scene identification tasks tap distinct cortical networks. In particular, we hypothesize that the PPA and RSC are critically involved in the identification of specific locations but play a less central role in other scene recognition tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997905     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  73 in total

1.  Timing of posterior parahippocampal gyrus activity reveals multiple scene processing stages.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; Giorgia Committeri; Philippe Kahane; Gaspare Galati; Lorella Minotti; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Which way was I going? Contextual retrieval supports the disambiguation of well learned overlapping navigational routes.

Authors:  Thackery I Brown; Robert S Ross; Joseph B Keller; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A network of amygdala connections predict individual differences in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Steven G Greening; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A Posterior-Anterior Distinction between Scene Perception and Scene Construction in Human Medial Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward H Silson; Adrian W Gilmore; Sarah E Kalinowski; Adam Steel; Alexis Kidder; Alex Martin; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Lindsay K Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Whitney E Parker; Alana M Feiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Emily J Ward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.