Literature DB >> 16248335

Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style.

Maria Kozhevnikov1, Stephen Kosslyn, Jennifer Shephard.   

Abstract

The visual system processes object properties (such as shape and color) and spatial properties (such as location and spatial relations) in distinct systems, and neuropsychological evidence reveals that mental imagery respects this distinction. The findings reported in this article demonstrate that verbalizers typically perform at an intermediate level on imagery tasks, whereas visualizers can be divided into two groups. Specifically, scores on spatial and object imagery tasks, along with a visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style questionnaire, identified a group of visualizers who scored poorly on spatial imagery tasks but excelled on object imagery tasks. In contrast, a second group of visualizers scored high on spatial imagery tasks but poorly on object imagery tasks. The results also indicate that object visualizers encode and process images holistically, as a single perceptual unit, whereas spatial visualizers generate and process images analytically, part by part. In addition, we found that scientists and engineers excel in spatial imagery and prefer spatial strategies, whereas visual artists excel in object imagery and prefer object-based strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248335     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: a replication.

Authors:  D C Geary; J W Gilger; B Elliott-Miller
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.509

2.  Detecting high-level and low-level properties in visual images and visual percepts.

Authors:  R Rouw; S M Kosslyn; R Hamel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-05

3.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.

Authors:  D F Marks
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1973-02

4.  Visual and spatial mental imagery: dissociable systems of representation.

Authors:  M J Farah; K M Hammond; D N Levine; R Calvanio
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: an fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test.

Authors:  V Prabhakaran; J A Smith; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

7.  Clinical uses of mental imagery: experimental foundations, theoretical misconceptions, and research issues.

Authors:  K D Strosahl; J C Ascough
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; C L Grady; B Horwitz; L G Ungerleider; M Mishkin; R E Carson; P Herscovitch; M B Schapiro; S I Rapoport
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task.

Authors:  D W Collins; D Kimura
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Two visual systems in mental imagery: dissociation of "what" and "where" in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions.

Authors:  D N Levine; J Warach; M Farah
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  54 in total

1.  Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities.

Authors:  Michael F Goodchild; Donald G Janelle
Journal:  GeoJournal       Date:  2010-02

2.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jonathan B Lin; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Object imagery and object identification: object imagers are better at identifying spatially-filtered visual objects.

Authors:  Manila Vannucci; Giuliana Mazzoni; Carlo Chiorri; Lavinia Cioli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-24

5.  Cortical reinstatement mediates the relationship between content-specific encoding activity and subsequent recollection decisions.

Authors:  Alan M Gordon; Jesse Rissman; Roozbeh Kiani; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: restriction in the development of visual-processing resources.

Authors:  Maria Kozhevnikov; Olesya Blazhenkova; Michael Becker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

Review 7.  Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation.

Authors:  Samuel T Moulton; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Saskia van Dantzig; Hendrik N J Schifferstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

9.  The Bergen left-right discrimination test: practice effects, reliable change indices, and strategic performance in the standard and alternate form with inverted stimuli.

Authors:  Philip Grewe; Hanno A Ohmann; Hans J Markowitsch; Martina Piefke
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.