Literature DB >> 20138795

What determines our navigational abilities?

Thomas Wolbers1, Mary Hegarty.   

Abstract

The ability to find one's way in our complex environments represents one of the most fundamental cognitive functions. Although involving basic perceptual and memory related processes, spatial navigation is particularly complex because it is a multisensory process in which information needs to be integrated and manipulated over time and space. Not surprisingly, humans differ widely in this ability, and recent animal and human work has begun to unveil the underlying mechanisms. Here, we consider three interdependent domains that have been related to navigational abilities: cognitive and perceptual factors, neural information processing and variability in brain microstructure. Together, the findings converge into an emerging model of how different factors interact to produce individual patterns of navigational performance. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138795     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  152 in total

Review 1.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Real world navigation independence in the early blind correlates with differential brain activity associated with virtual navigation.

Authors:  Mark A Halko; Erin C Connors; Jaime Sánchez; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Error detection and error memory in spatial navigation as reflected by electrodermal activity.

Authors:  Lisa Holper; Natalie Jäger; Felix Scholkmann; Martin Wolf
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-05-23

4.  A dedicated system for topographical working memory: evidence from domain-specific interference tests.

Authors:  L Piccardi; R Nori; M Boccia; S Barbetti; P Verde; C Guariglia; F Ferlazzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Yaroslav Konar; Quoc C Vuong; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Total and regional brain volumes in a population-based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Distraction shrinks space.

Authors:  Jesse Q Sargent; Jeffrey M Zacks; John W Philbeck; Shaney Flores
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

8.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Considering spatial ability in virtual route learning in early aging.

Authors:  Valérie Gyselinck; Chiara Meneghetti; Monica Bormetti; Eric Orriols; Pascale Piolino; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.