Literature DB >> 16627352

Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.

Gabriele Janzen1.   

Abstract

In everyday life people have to deal with tasks such as finding a novel path to a certain goal location, finding one's way back, finding a short cut, or making a detour. In all of these tasks people acquire route knowledge. For finding the same way back they have to remember locations of objects like buildings and additionally direction changes. In three experiments using recognition tasks as well as conscious and unconscious spatial priming paradigms memory processes underlying wayfinding behaviour were investigated. Participants learned a route through a virtual environment with objects either placed at intersections (i.e., decision points) where another route could be chosen or placed along the route (non-decision points). Analyses indicate first that objects placed at decision points are recognized faster than other objects. Second, they indicate that the direction in which a route is travelled is represented only at locations that are relevant for wayfinding (e.g., decision points). The results point out the efficient way in which memory for object location and memory for route direction interact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627352     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  22 in total

1.  Selecting landmarks in novel environments.

Authors:  Jared Miller; Laura Carlson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

Review 2.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Route repetition and route reversal: Effects of age and encoding method.

Authors:  Samantha Allison; Denise Head
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05

4.  Spatial navigational impairments in hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Matthew G Buckley
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

5.  The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge.

Authors:  Roy A Ruddle; Ekaterina Volkova; Betty Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

6.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality.

Authors:  Laura A Cushman; Karen Stein; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Landmark recognition in Alzheimer's dementia: spared implicit memory for objects relevant for navigation.

Authors:  Roy P C Kessels; Amy van Doormaal; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neurocognitive development of memory for landmarks.

Authors:  Janneke van Ekert; Joost Wegman; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-06

10.  From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation.

Authors:  Edgar Chan; Oliver Baumann; Mark A Bellgrove; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.