Literature DB >> 27659638

The development and piloting of the graduate assessment of preparedness for practice (GAPP) questionnaire.

M S Ray1, A M Milston2, P W Doherty2, S Crean3.   

Abstract

Introduction Most new dental graduates in the UK begin their professional career following a year in dental foundation training (DFT). There has been little investigation of how prepared they feel for independent general dental practice across all four domains of the General Dental Council's curriculum 'Preparing for practice'. This paper describes the development of the Graduate Assessment of Preparedness for Practice (GAPP) questionnaire to address this.Methodology The GAPP questionnaire was developed and piloted using a cohort of educational supervisors (ESs) and foundation dentists (FDs). The questionnaire comprised three parts, the first of which collected respondent demographic data. The second was based on Preparing for practice and was used to develop 34 'competence areas' and required a tick-box response on a 7-category Likert Scale. The third comprised free text questions in order to further explore the subject's responses.Results Pilot feedback was positive, the statements were felt to be clear and unambiguous, allowing them sufficient scope to state their position. The pilot study informed small cosmetic changes to the GAPP questionnaire and inclusion of a 'comments' column for respondents to qualify their responses. The pilot results indicated that both FDs and their ESs felt that at ten months of DFT, the FDs were very well prepared for independent general dental practice.Discussion The paper describes the important considerations relating to the reliability and validity of the GAPP questionnaire.Conclusions GAPP appears to be a suitable questionnaire to measure preparedness of new graduates with a degree of reliability and validity. The instrument is designed to be simple to complete and provides a useful analytical instrument for both self-assessment of competence and for wider use within dental education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659638     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  11 in total

1.  Self-perceived competency at graduation: a comparison of dental graduates from the Adelaide PBL curriculum and the Toronto traditional curriculum.

Authors:  L F Greenwood; G C Townsend; J D Wetherell; G A Mullins
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.355

2.  An assessment of the views held by recent graduates on their undergraduate course.

Authors:  F J Murray; A S Blinkhorn; J Bulman
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.355

3.  Experiences and perceptions of vocational training reported by the 1999 cohort of vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in England and Wales.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; P Y Coward; R Wilson; D Goodsman; J Darby
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.

Authors:  John M Linacre
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2002

5.  Are graduates as good as they used to be?

Authors:  L B Cabot; D R Radford
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1999-04-10       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission.

Authors:  W R GARNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Evaluation of vocational training of dentists in three different regions.

Authors:  R Clow; S Mehra
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-12-23       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Undergraduate training as preparation for vocational training in England: a survey of vocational dental practitioners' and their trainers' views.

Authors:  J Patel; K Fox; B Grieveson; C C Youngson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Experience, skill and knowledge gained by newly qualified dentists during their first year of general practice.

Authors:  R S Levine
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1992-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  British dentists and final year British and United States students' opinions about their undergraduate training.

Authors:  J B Silversin; S M Shafer; F C Smales; A Sheiham
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1974-09-03       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating major curriculum change: the effect on student confidence.

Authors:  V Bissell; D P Robertson; C W McCurry; J P G McAleer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  How prepared are foundation dentists in England and Wales for independent general dental practice?

Authors:  M Ray; A Milston; P Doherty; S Crean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  From inputs to outputs: an analysis of the changes to learning outcomes for dental undergraduate education in the UK.

Authors:  Helen Mather; Heidi Bateman; John Taylor; Christopher Vernazza; Charlotte Rothwell; Giles McCracken; Janice Ellis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Mind the 'GAPP': a pre-graduation assessment of preparedness for practice amid a pandemic.

Authors:  Christopher C Donnell; Luke R Thomas; Jennifer I Foley
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.727

5.  Preparedness for practice of newly qualified dental professionals in Australia - educator, employer, and consumer perspectives.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mariño; Clare Delany; David Manton; Kate Reid; Julie Satur; Felicity Crombie; Rebecca Wong; Clare McNally; Diego Lopez; Antonio Celentano; Mathew Lim; Michael Morgan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Preparedness for practice of newly qualified dental practitioners in the Australian context: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mariño; Clare Delany; David J Manton; Katharine Reid; Julie Satur; Felicity Crombie; Rebecca Wong; Clare McNally; Geoffrey G Adams; Diego Lopez; Antonio Celentano; Mathew Lim; Mike Morgan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.263

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.