Literature DB >> 35091613

From inputs to outputs: an analysis of the changes to learning outcomes for dental undergraduate education in the UK.

Helen Mather1, Heidi Bateman2, John Taylor2, Christopher Vernazza2, Charlotte Rothwell3, Giles McCracken2, Janice Ellis2.   

Abstract

Introduction/aims Preparing for practice (PfP) was thought to represent a significant shift in the expectations of dental undergraduates compared to its predecessor, The first five years (TFFY). This project aimed to explore requirement changes by comparing learning outcomes for undergraduate dentists in these two documents. Changes in curriculum requirements defining clinical, professional, or a blend of these skills were also investigated.Methods Curriculum mapping was used to compare learning outcomes in PfP to requirements in TFFY.Results The total number of learning outcomes increased from 101 to 149 in PfP compared to TFFY. There was a proportional reduction in outcomes describing clinical skills and an increase in the proportion of outcomes describing professional and blended skills. Three TFFY requirements did not appear in PfP and a further 23 learning outcomes in PfP were absent in TFFY.Conclusions In the transition from TFFY to PfP, there has been an overall increase in the number of outcomes graduates must attain before they can register with the General Dental Council. There are more outcomes defining professionalism which subsequently has resulted in proportional but not actual decrease in outcomes related to clinical skills. While there is uncertainty over how schools have managed curricula to incorporate these changes and thus whether the perception of graduate preparedness can be directly attributable to these changes, it is timely to consider any changes within dental learning outcomes in the context of preparedness concerns.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35091613      PMCID: PMC8796198          DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-3873-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  20 in total

1.  What makes a good dentist and do recent trainees make the grade? The views of vocational trainers.

Authors:  D Buck; S Malik; N Murphy; V Patel; S Singh; B Syed; N Vorah
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-11-25       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Experiences and perceptions of vocational training reported by the 1999 cohort of vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in England and Wales.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; P Y Coward; R Wilson; D Goodsman; J Darby
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Undergraduate training as preparation for vocational training in England: a survey of vocational dental practitioners' and their trainers' views.

Authors:  J Patel; K Fox; B Grieveson; C C Youngson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Vocational trainees' views of their undergraduate endodontic training and their vocational training experience.

Authors:  D J Brookman
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.264

5.  Preparedness of undergraduate dental students in the United Kingdom: a national study.

Authors:  K Ali; A Slade; E Kay; D Zahra; C Tredwin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Dental education: Potentially damaging disconnect.

Authors:  L Cabot; M Woolford; A Banerjee; M Cobourne; A Hasan; H Lewis-Greene; M Packer; S Sood; J Turner; E Whaites
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Clinical skills of a new foundation dentist: the expectations of dental foundation education supervisors.

Authors:  A S M Gilmour; R J Jones; J G Cowpe; A D Bullock
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Prepared for practice and equipped for employment: what do dental foundation trainers think of their trainees?

Authors:  S Hanks; C Coelho; R Coster
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  British dentists and final year British and United States students' opinions about their undergraduate training.

Authors:  J B Silversin; S M Shafer; F C Smales; A Sheiham
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1974-09-03       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  The standard of newly qualified dental graduates - foundation trainer perceptions.

Authors:  C J Oxley; R Dennick; P Batchelor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  1 in total

1.  Medicine in dentistry.

Authors:  P A Atkin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.727

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.