Literature DB >> 13703706

Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission.

W R GARNER.   

Abstract

Keywords:  COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS

Mesh：

Year:  1960        PMID： 13703706     DOI： 10.1037/h0043047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN： 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?

Authors:  Natalja Menold; Tenko Raykov
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  The development and piloting of the graduate assessment of preparedness for practice (GAPP) questionnaire.

Authors:  M S Ray; A M Milston; P W Doherty; S Crean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Impact of Rating Scale Categories on Reliability and Fit Statistics of the Malay Spiritual Well-Being Scale using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Aqil Mohammad Daher; Syed Hassan Ahmad; Than Winn; Mohd Ikhsan Selamat
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan G Tullis; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  An Internet-based symptom questionnaire that is reliable, valid, and available to psychiatrists, neurologists, and psychologists.

Authors:  C Thomas Gualtieri
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-10-03

6.  "Translating" between survey answer formats.

Authors:  Sara Dolnicar; Bettina Grün
Journal:  J Bus Res       Date:  2013-09

7.  Profound vision loss impairs psychological well-being in young and middle-aged individuals.

Authors:  Giancarlo A Garcia; Matin Khoshnevis; Jesse Gale; Starleen E Frousiakis; Tiffany J Hwang; Lissa Poincenot; Rustum Karanjia; David Baron; Alfredo A Sadun
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-22

8.  Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.077
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.