Literature DB >> 27656893

Breeding Value of Primary Synthetic Wheat Genotypes for Grain Yield.

Jafar Jafarzadeh1, David Bonnett2, Jean-Luc Jannink3, Deniz Akdemir1, Susanne Dreisigacker2, Mark E Sorrells1.   

Abstract

To introduce new genetic diversity into the bread wheat gene pool from its progenitor, Aegilops tauschii (Coss.) Schmalh, 33 primary synthetic hexaploid wheat genotypes (SYN) were crossed to 20 spring bread wheat (BW) cultivars at the International Wheat and Maize Improvement Center. Modified single seed descent was used to develop 97 populations with 50 individuals per population using first back-cross, biparental, and three-way crosses. Individuals from each cross were selected for short stature, early heading, flowering and maturity, minimal lodging, and free threshing. Yield trials were conducted under irrigated, drought, and heat-stress conditions from 2011 to 2014 in Ciudad Obregon, Mexico. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of parents and synthetic derived lines (SDLs) were estimated using a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model with markers in each trial. In each environment, there were SDLs that had higher GEBVs than their recurrent BW parent for yield. The GEBVs of BW parents for yield ranged from -0.32 in heat to 1.40 in irrigated trials. The range of the SYN parent GEBVs for yield was from -2.69 in the irrigated to 0.26 in the heat trials and were mostly negative across environments. The contribution of the SYN parents to improved grain yield of the SDLs was highest under heat stress, with an average GEBV for the top 10% of the SDLs of 0.55 while the weighted average GEBV of their corresponding recurrent BW parents was 0.26. Using the pedigree-based model, the accuracy of genomic prediction for yield was 0.42, 0.43, and 0.49 in the drought, heat and irrigated trials, respectively, while for the marker-based model these values were 0.43, 0.44, and 0.55. The SYN parents introduced novel diversity into the wheat gene pool. Higher GEBVs of progenies were due to introgression and retention of some positive alleles from SYN parents.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27656893      PMCID: PMC5033409          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

1.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.

Authors:  A Nejati-Javaremi; C Smith; J P Gibson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.).

Authors:  Filippo M Bassi; Alison R Bentley; Gilles Charmet; Rodomiro Ortiz; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.729

3.  Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model.

Authors:  B Villanueva; R Pong-Wong; J Fernández; M A Toro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Genomic selection.

Authors:  M E Goddard; B J Hayes
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  A Legarra; I Aguilar; I Misztal
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Hongding Gao; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Ulrik S Nielsen; Yuan Zhang; Mogens S Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine.

Authors:  Jaime Zapata-Valenzuela; Ross W Whetten; David Neale; Steve McKeand; Fikret Isik
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  13 in total

1.  Genetic networks underlying salinity tolerance in wheat uncovered with genome-wide analyses and selective sweeps.

Authors:  Danting Shan; Mohsin Ali; Mohammed Shahid; Anjuman Arif; Muhammad Qandeel Waheed; Xianchun Xia; Richard Trethowan; Mark Tester; Jesse Poland; Francis C Ogbonnaya; Awais Rasheed; Zhonghu He; Huihui Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.574

2.  Juvenile heat stress tolerance in Triticum durum-Aegilops tauschii derived synthetics: a way forward for wheat improvement.

Authors:  Amandeep Kaur; Satvir Kaur Grewal; Sarabjit Kaur; Achla Sharma; Puja Srivastava; Monika Garg; Shabir Hussain Wani; Parveen Chhuneja; Kuldeep Singh; Satinder Kaur
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  Wheat genetic resources in the post-genomics era: promise and challenges.

Authors:  Awais Rasheed; Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi; Francis Chuks Ogbonnaya; Zhonghu He; Sanjaya Rajaram
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat.

Authors:  Awais Rasheed; Xianchun Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Quantitative trait locus analysis for spikelet shape-related traits in wild wheat progenitor Aegilops tauschii: Implications for intraspecific diversification and subspecies differentiation.

Authors:  Ryo Nishijima; Yuki Okamoto; Hitoshi Hatano; Shigeo Takumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Investigating Drought Tolerance in Chickpea Using Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Genomic Selection Based on Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.

Authors:  Yongle Li; Pradeep Ruperao; Jacqueline Batley; David Edwards; Tanveer Khan; Timothy D Colmer; Jiayin Pang; Kadambot H M Siddique; Tim Sutton
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  A population of wheat multiple synthetic derivatives: an effective platform to explore, harness and utilize genetic diversity of Aegilops tauschii for wheat improvement.

Authors:  Yasir Serag Alnor Gorafi; June-Sik Kim; Awad Ahmed Elawad Elbashir; Hisashi Tsujimoto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal Footprints of Divergent Selection and Drought Adaptive Traits in Synthetic-Derived Wheats.

Authors:  Fakiha Afzal; Huihui Li; Alvina Gul; Abid Subhani; Ahmad Ali; Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi; Francis Ogbonnaya; Richard Trethowan; Xianchun Xia; Zhonghu He; Awais Rasheed
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genetic Contribution of Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat to CIMMYT's Spring Bread Wheat Breeding Germplasm.

Authors:  Umesh Rosyara; Masahiro Kishii; Thomas Payne; Carolina Paola Sansaloni; Ravi Prakash Singh; Hans-Joachim Braun; Susanne Dreisigacker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Gains through selection for grain yield in a winter wheat breeding program.

Authors:  Dennis N Lozada; Brian P Ward; Arron H Carter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.