Literature DB >> 9222829

Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.

A Nejati-Javaremi1, C Smith, J P Gibson.   

Abstract

Total allelic relationship (TA) as a possible alternative to the pedigree-derived additive genetic relationship (RA) is defined. The TA measures the actual allelic identity between individuals for loci segregating for the trait concerned. Its value was studied by simulation in populations of different family structure, different numbers of loci, different numbers of alleles per locus, and different heritability levels. The alternative types of relationship matrices were used in mixed model equations to derive best linear unbiased prediction estimates (EBV) of breeding values (BV). Accuracies of evaluations were calculated as correlations of EBV with true breeding values. In populations with random selection and mating, EBVTA derived using TA had higher accuracies than EBVRA derived using RA. In populations with selection, EBVTA was more accurate and resulted in higher responses than selection on EBVRA. We conclude that not accounting for variation in average measures of relationship and identity in state can be important sources of variance of prediction error, and taking account of them increases the accuracy of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9222829     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7571738x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  71 in total

1.  Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador A Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies.

Authors:  E Bomcke; N Gengler
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.

Authors:  Adriana García-Ruiz; John B Cole; Paul M VanRaden; George R Wiggans; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Jennie Pryce; Amanda J Chamberlain; Phil J Bowman; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Phillip J Bowman; Amanda C Chamberlain; Klara Verbyla; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.