Awais Rasheed1,2, Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi3, Francis Chuks Ogbonnaya4, Zhonghu He1,2, Sanjaya Rajaram5. 1. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), c/o Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China. 2. Institute of Crop Sciences, CAAS, China. 3. Texas A&M University, USA. 4. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), Australia. 5. Resource Seeds International, Mexico.
Abstract
Background: Wheat genetic resources have been used for genetic improvement since 1876, when Stephen Wilson (Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 12: 286) consciously made the first wide hybrid involving wheat and rye in Scotland. Wide crossing continued with sporadic attempts in the first half of 19th century and became a sophisticated scientific discipline during the last few decades with considerable impact in farmers' fields. However, a large diversity of untapped genetic resources could contribute in meeting future wheat production challenges. Perspectives and Conclusion: Recently the complete reference genome of hexaploid (Chinese Spring) and tetraploid (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) wheat became publicly available coupled with on-going international efforts on wheat pan-genome sequencing. We anticipate that an objective appraisal is required in the post-genomics era to prioritize genetic resources for use in the improvement of wheat production if the goal of doubling yield by 2050 is to be met. Advances in genomics have resulted in the development of high-throughput genotyping arrays, improved and efficient methods of gene discovery, genomics-assisted selection and gene editing using endonucleases. Likewise, ongoing advances in rapid generation turnover, improved phenotyping, envirotyping and analytical methods will significantly accelerate exploitation of exotic genes and increase the rate of genetic gain in breeding. We argue that the integration of these advances will significantly improve the precision and targeted identification of potentially useful variation in the wild relatives of wheat, providing new opportunities to contribute to yield and quality improvement, tolerance to abiotic stresses, resistance to emerging biotic stresses and resilience to weather extremes.
Background: Wheat genetic resources have been used for genetic improvement since 1876, when Stephen Wilson (Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 12: 286) consciously made the first wide hybrid involving wheat and rye in Scotland. Wide crossing continued with sporadic attempts in the first half of 19th century and became a sophisticated scientific discipline during the last few decades with considerable impact in farmers' fields. However, a large diversity of untapped genetic resources could contribute in meeting future wheat production challenges. Perspectives and Conclusion: Recently the complete reference genome of hexaploid (Chinese Spring) and tetraploid (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) wheat became publicly available coupled with on-going international efforts on wheat pan-genome sequencing. We anticipate that an objective appraisal is required in the post-genomics era to prioritize genetic resources for use in the improvement of wheat production if the goal of doubling yield by 2050 is to be met. Advances in genomics have resulted in the development of high-throughput genotyping arrays, improved and efficient methods of gene discovery, genomics-assisted selection and gene editing using endonucleases. Likewise, ongoing advances in rapid generation turnover, improved phenotyping, envirotyping and analytical methods will significantly accelerate exploitation of exotic genes and increase the rate of genetic gain in breeding. We argue that the integration of these advances will significantly improve the precision and targeted identification of potentially useful variation in the wild relatives of wheat, providing new opportunities to contribute to yield and quality improvement, tolerance to abiotic stresses, resistance to emerging biotic stresses and resilience to weather extremes.
Authors: Susan McCouch; Gregory J Baute; James Bradeen; Paula Bramel; Peter K Bretting; Edward Buckler; John M Burke; David Charest; Sylvie Cloutier; Glenn Cole; Hannes Dempewolf; Michael Dingkuhn; Catherine Feuillet; Paul Gepts; Dario Grattapaglia; Luigi Guarino; Scott Jackson; Sandra Knapp; Peter Langridge; Amy Lawton-Rauh; Qui Lijua; Charlotte Lusty; Todd Michael; Sean Myles; Ken Naito; Randall L Nelson; Reno Pontarollo; Christopher M Richards; Loren Rieseberg; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Steve Rounsley; Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton; Ulrich Schurr; Nils Stein; Norihiko Tomooka; Esther van der Knaap; David van Tassel; Jane Toll; Jose Valls; Rajeev K Varshney; Judson Ward; Robbie Waugh; Peter Wenzl; Daniel Zamir Journal: Nature Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Burkhard Steuernagel; Sambasivam K Periyannan; Inmaculada Hernández-Pinzón; Kamil Witek; Matthew N Rouse; Guotai Yu; Asyraf Hatta; Mick Ayliffe; Harbans Bariana; Jonathan D G Jones; Evans S Lagudah; Brande B H Wulff Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Luzie U Wingen; Claire West; Michelle Leverington-Waite; Sarah Collier; Simon Orford; Richard Goram; Cai-Yun Yang; Julie King; Alexandra M Allen; Amanda Burridge; Keith J Edwards; Simon Griffiths Journal: Genetics Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: James S Borrell; Manosh K Biswas; Mark Goodwin; Guy Blomme; Trude Schwarzacher; J S Pat Heslop-Harrison; Abebe M Wendawek; Admas Berhanu; Simon Kallow; Steven Janssens; Ermias L Molla; Aaron P Davis; Feleke Woldeyes; Kathy Willis; Sebsebe Demissew; Paul Wilkin Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: G Taylor; I S Donnison; D Murphy-Bokern; M Morgante; M-B Bogeat-Triboulot; R Bhalerao; M Hertzberg; A Polle; A Harfouche; F Alasia; V Petoussi; D Trebbi; K Schwarz; J J B Keurentjes; M Centritto; B Genty; J Flexas; E Grill; S Salvi; W J Davies Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 4.357