Literature DB >> 27631741

Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Jenny A Higgins1, Renee D Kramer1, Kristin M Ryder1.   

Abstract

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is effective and acceptable. However, concern exists about potential provider bias in LARC promotion. No study has documented contraceptive users' attitudes toward or experiences with provider influence and bias regarding LARC. We collected qualitative data in 2014 to address this gap. Participants were 50 young adult women with any history of contraceptive use (including LARC) in Dane County, Wisconsin. Women often described providers as a trusted source of contraceptive information. However, several women reported that their preferences regarding contraceptive selection or removal were not honored. Furthermore, many participants believed that providers recommend LARC disproportionately to socially marginalized women. We encourage contraceptive counseling and removal protocols that directly address historical reproductive injustices and that honor patients' wishes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27631741      PMCID: PMC5055778          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  22 in total

1.  Informing abortion counseling: an examination of evidence-based practices used in emotional care for other stigmatized and sensitive health issues.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Kate Cockrill; Lori R Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-12

2.  Beyond Coercion: Let Us Grapple With Bias.

Authors:  Melissa L Gilliam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Realizing Reproductive Health Equity Needs More Than Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC).

Authors:  Aline C Gubrium; Emily S Mann; Sonya Borrero; Christine Dehlendorf; Jessica Fields; Arline T Geronimus; Anu M Gómez; Lisa H Harris; Jenny A Higgins; Katrina Kimport; Kristin Luker; Zakiya Luna; Laura Mamo; Dorothy Roberts; Diana Romero; Gretchen Sisson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Rachel Ruskin; Kevin Grumbach; Eric Vittinghoff; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Dean Schillinger; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Young women's knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Authors:  Erica L Spies; Natoshia M Askelson; Emma Gelman; Mary Losch
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

6.  Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Kyla Z Donnelly; Tina C Foster; Rachel Thompson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers.

Authors:  Katherine Blumoff Greenberg; Kevin K Makino; Mandy S Coles
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 10.  Awareness of long-acting reversible contraception among teens and young adults.

Authors:  Stephanie B Teal; S Elizabeth Romer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  42 in total

1.  Agreement between Self-Reported "Ideal" and Currently Used Contraceptive Methods among Women Veterans Using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Authors:  Colleen P Judge-Golden; Tierney E Wolgemuth; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-04-19

2.  Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Titilope Oduyebo; Lauren B Zapata; Maegan E Boutot; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise V D'Angelo; Polly A Marchbanks; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  Talking about male body-based contraceptives: The counseling visit and the feminization of contraception.

Authors:  Katrina Kimport
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  A shot at equity? Addressing disparities among Black MSM in the coming era of long-acting injectable preexposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  William C Goedel; Amy S Nunn; Philip A Chan; Dustin T Duncan; Katie B Biello; Steven A Safren; Brandon D L Marshall
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Do Adolescent Women's Contraceptive Preferences Predict Method Use and Satisfaction? A Survey of Northern California Family Planning Clients.

Authors:  Amelia W Walker; Lisa Stern; Danielle Cipres; Amanda Rodriguez; Janette Alvarez; Dominika Seidman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Racial and ethnic differences in patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Renee D Kramer; Jenny A Higgins; Amy L Godecker; Deborah B Ehrenthal
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Reiley Reed; Edith Fox; Dominika Seidman; Cara Hall; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Strategies and safeguards to ensure access to long-acting reversible contraception removal after the Zika Contraception Access Network ended: A prospective analysis of patient reported complaints.

Authors:  Lisa Romero; Zipatly Mendoza; Stacey Hurst; Lauren B Zapata; Rachel Powell; Yari Vale; Eva Lathrop
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.