Literature DB >> 29433012

Talking about male body-based contraceptives: The counseling visit and the feminization of contraception.

Katrina Kimport1.   

Abstract

In developed countries, women bear the primary, and sometimes exclusive, responsibility for preventing pregnancy in heterosexual sexual relations. This unequal burden is not an intrinsic fact; it is the consequence of broad social narratives and interpersonal negotiations. The contraceptive counseling visit is increasingly recognized as a site of the discursive production of normative ideas about reproduction, suggesting that clinicians themselves may contribute to the assignment of responsibility for contraceptive labor to women (i.e. the feminization of contraception). Scholars have not yet considered how providers talk to patients about methods that are male body-based (i.e. condoms, withdrawal, and vasectomy) and, as such, may disrupt the feminization of responsibility for contraception. Using transcripts of 101 contraceptive counseling visits recorded between 2009 and 2012 in the San Francisco Bay Area, I investigate how clinicians discuss male body-based methods with female patients. Drawing on a constructivist approach, I find that clinicians generally devalued male body-based methods in their counseling. They did so by, first, failing to discuss them as options for long-term contraception. Second, when they did discuss them, clinicians tended to emphasize aspects of the methods that were presumed "negative" (e.g. the lower efficacy of withdrawal and condoms) but not features that patients might view positively (e.g. the high efficacy of vasectomy or the lack of side effects with condoms and withdrawal). In aggregate, these discursive practices marginalize male body-based methods as contraceptive choices. As a practical effect, this may encourage women to choose a method that does not best meet their preferences. At a structural level, by devaluing methods that could undercut the unequal division of fertility work, these discursive patterns contribute to the feminization of responsibility for contraception and the retrenchment of the unequal gendered division of fertility work.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive counseling; Gender; USA; Vasectomy; Withdrawal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29433012      PMCID: PMC6101247          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  24 in total

Review 1.  Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Julie Fennell; Jenny A Higgins; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Dual method use at last sexual encounter: a nationally representative, episode-level analysis of US men and women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith; Stephanie A Sanders; Vanessa Schick; Debby Herbenick; Michael Reece; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.

Authors:  Grace Shih; David K Turok; Willie J Parker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Men's heightened risk of AIDS-related death: the legacy of gendered HIV testing and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Kathryn Dovel; Sara Yeatman; Susan Watkins; Michelle Poulin
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 5.  The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-03-08

6.  Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health.

Authors:  Roberta A Downing; Thomas A LaVeist; Heather E Bullock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US.

Authors:  William R Grady; Daniel H Klepinger; John O G Billy; Lisa A Cubbins
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2010-01-18

8.  Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: differences by race and education.

Authors:  Krystale E Littlejohn
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

9.  Prevalence of and characteristics associated with use of withdrawal among women in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Jason Ong; Meredith Temple-Smith; William Wong; Kathleen McNamee; Christopher Fairley
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-04-30

10.  The effect of vasectomy on the sexual life of couples.

Authors:  Badereddin Mohamad Al-Ali; Rany Shamloul; Josef Ramsauer; Anthony J Bella; Ulfrit Scrinzi; Thomas Treu; Andreas Jungwirth
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.802

View more
  2 in total

1.  'I feel like a person has a right to use a product to protect themselves…': a qualitative study of the risk-benefit calculus on women's contraceptive use and choice.

Authors:  Sofía L Carbone; Melissa Guillen; Jaime J Ramirez; Sara E Vargas; Connie Fei Lu; Melissa L Getz; Yaa Frimpong; Kelley A Smith; Claire Stout; Iris Tong; Melanie Hill; Robert E Berry; Abigail Harrison; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.706

2.  "We Kind of Met In-Between": A Qualitative Analysis of Young Couples' Relationship Dynamics and Negotiations About Pregnancy Intentions.

Authors:  Stephanie Arteaga; Margaret Mary Downey; Bridget Freihart; Anu Manchikanti Gómez
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.