Literature DB >> 20598282

Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Christine Dehlendorf1, Rachel Ruskin, Kevin Grumbach, Eric Vittinghoff, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Dean Schillinger, Jody Steinauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations by health care providers have been found to vary by patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status and may contribute to health disparities. This study investigated the effect of these factors on recommendations for contraception. STUDY
DESIGN: One of 18 videos depicting patients of varying sociodemographic characteristics was shown to each of 524 health care providers. Providers indicated whether they would recommend levonorgestrel intrauterine contraception to the patient shown in the video.
RESULTS: Low socioeconomic status whites were less likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than high socioeconomic status whites (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.69); whereas, socioeconomic status had no significant effect among Latinas and blacks. By race/ethnicity, low socioeconomic status Latinas and blacks were more likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than low socioeconomic status whites (OR, 3.4; and 95% CI, 1.1-10.2 and OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6, respectively), with no effect of race/ethnicity for high socioeconomic status patients.
CONCLUSION: Providers may have biases about intrauterine contraception or make assumptions about its use based on patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598282      PMCID: PMC3012124          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  31 in total

1.  Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Joanne M Garrett; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project (US).

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Pamela D Waterman; Jarvis T Chen; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Birth control, population control, and family planning: an overview.

Authors:  D T Critchlow
Journal:  J Policy Hist       Date:  1995

5.  Are racial disparities in health conditional on socioeconomic status?

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Kenneth F Ferraro
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age.

Authors:  Sheryl Thorburn; Laura M Bogart
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2005-08

7.  The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Eleanor B Schwarz; Mitchell Creinin; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  An elucidation of factors influencing physicians' willingness to perform elective female sterilization.

Authors:  D D Harrison; C W Cooke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differences.

Authors:  Davida Becker; Amy O Tsui
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2008-12

10.  Effect of patient socioeconomic status on perceptions of first- and second-year medical students.

Authors:  James K H Woo; Sahar H Ghorayeb; Cheong K Lee; Harpreet Sangha; Suzanne Richter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  53 in total

1.  Race-Ethnic Differences in the Non-marital Fertility Rates in 2006-2010.

Authors:  Yujin Kim; R Kelly Raley
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-08-08

2.  Agreement between Self-Reported "Ideal" and Currently Used Contraceptive Methods among Women Veterans Using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Authors:  Colleen P Judge-Golden; Tierney E Wolgemuth; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-04-19

3.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Family planning providers' role in offering PrEP to women.

Authors:  Dominika Seidman; Shannon Weber; Kimberly Carlson; Jacki Witt
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.

Authors:  Grace Shih; Eric Vittinghoff; Jody Steinauer; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

6.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 7.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

10.  Black-White Differences in Sex and Contraceptive Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber; Elizabeth J Ela; Amelia Bucek
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.