Literature DB >> 32858053

Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Kavita Shah Arora1, Roselle Ponsaran2, Laura Morello2, Leila Katabi2, Rosemary T Behmer Hansen2, Nikki Zite3, Kari White4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the attitudes and beliefs of obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States (US) regarding the Medicaid postpartum sterilization policy. STUDY
DESIGN: We recruited obstetrician-gynecologists practicing in ten geographically diverse US states for a qualitative study using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists directory. We conducted semi-structured interviews via telephone, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method and principles of grounded theory.
RESULTS: We interviewed thirty obstetrician-gynecologists (63.3% women, 76.7% non-subspecialized, and 53.3% academic setting). Participants largely described the consent form as unnecessary, paternalistic, an administrative hassle, a barrier to desired patient care, and associated with worse health outcomes. Views on the waiting period's utility and impact were mixed. Many participants felt the sterilization policy was discriminatory. However, some participants noted the policy's importance in terms of the historical basis, used the form as a counseling tool to remind patients of the permanence of sterilization, felt the policy prompted them to counsel regarding sterilization, and protected patients in contemporary medical practice.
CONCLUSION: Many physicians shared concerns about the ethics and clinical impact of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Future revisions to the Medicaid sterilization policy must balance prevention of coercion with reduction in barriers to those desiring sterilization in order to maximize reproductive autonomy. IMPLICATIONS: Obstetrician-gynecologists are key stakeholders of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Obstetrician-gynecologists largely believe that revision to the Medicaid sterilization policy is warranted to balance reduction of external barriers to desired care with a process that enforces the need for counseling regarding contraception and reviewing patient preference for sterilization throughout pregnancy in order to minimize regret.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparities; Medicaid; Obstetrician–gynecologists; Postpartum sterilization; Reproductive justice; Unintended pregnancies; Women’s health policy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32858053      PMCID: PMC7606385          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  28 in total

1.  African American women and family planning services: perceptions of discrimination.

Authors:  Sheryl Thorburn; Laura M Bogart
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2005

2.  County-level racial prejudice and the black-white gap in infant health outcomes.

Authors:  Jacob Orchard; Joseph Price
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Tammy Chang; Michele Heisler; Lindsay Admon; Acham Gebremariam; Vanessa K Dalton; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Factors influencing physicians' advice about female sterilization in USA: a national survey.

Authors:  R E Lawrence; K A Rasinski; J D Yoon; F A Curlin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Torri Janecek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Women's decision making for postpartum sterilization: does the Medicaid waiting period add value?

Authors:  Olivia Foley; Elizabeth Janiak; Caryn Dutton
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health.

Authors:  Roberta A Downing; Thomas A LaVeist; Heather E Bullock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Committee Opinion No. 654: Reproductive Life Planning to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The use of a low-literacy version of the Medicaid sterilization consent form to assess sterilization-related knowledge in Spanish-speaking women: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melissa F Natavio; Victoria K Cortessis; Nikki B Zite; Katharine Ciesielski; Hilary Eggers; Niquelle Brown; Penina Segall-Gutierrez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Obstetrician-gynecologists' counseling regarding postpartum sterilization.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Neko Castleberry; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Variation in the interpretation and application of the Medicaid sterilization consent form among Medicaid officials.

Authors:  Colin B Russell; Neena Qasba; Megan L Evans; Angela Frankel; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Practices in Postpartum Sterilization Without a Valid Medicaid Consent Form.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.