Literature DB >> 23427785

Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers.

Katherine Blumoff Greenberg1, Kevin K Makino, Mandy S Coles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify provider and practice characteristics associated with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC, either progesterone contraceptive implants or intrauterine devices [IUDs]) provision among adolescent health care providers.
METHODS: We used data from a previously conducted survey of US providers on reproductive health to predict provision of any form of LARC as well as progesterone contraceptive implants or IUDs specifically using Chi-square and multivariate logistic regressions.
RESULTS: One third of providers reported any LARC provision. In logistic regressions, residency training in obstetrics/gynecology or family medicine (rather than internal medicine/pediatrics) was the strongest predictor of LARC provision, particularly for IUDs.
CONCLUSIONS: A minority of providers reported offering IUDs or contraceptive implants, most of whom had received procedural women's health training. Increasing the number of providers offering this type of contraception may help to prevent adolescent pregnancies and may be most easily accomplished via training in contraceptive implant provision.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23427785      PMCID: PMC3725589          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  8 in total

1.  Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues.

Authors:  Jonathan D Klein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer; Susheela Singh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Teen fertility in transition: recent and historic trends in the United States.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Andrea J Melnikas
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  IUDs and adolescents--an under-utilized opportunity for pregnancy prevention.

Authors:  Sophia Yen; Tammy Saah; Paula J Adams Hillard
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Knowledge of medication abortion among adolescent medicine providers.

Authors:  Mandy S Coles; Kevin K Makino; Rachael Phelps
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Authors:  Isabel A Morgan; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

3.  Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Hillel W Cohen; John S Santelli; M Diane McKee
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Interdependent Barriers to Providing Adolescents with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Qualitative Insights from Providers.

Authors:  Molly K Murphy; Cindy Stoffel; Meghan Nolan; Sadia Haider
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Pregnancy Ambivalence and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use Among Young Adult Women: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-04-17

7.  Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Jayme L Congdon; Lee A Trope; Janine S Bruce; Paul J Chung; Christine Dehlendorf; Lisa J Chamberlain
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-03

8.  Racial Disparities in Reproductive Healthcare among Parous and Nulliparous Women in Mississippi.

Authors:  Tanya Funchess; Morgan W Bradwell; Stephanie T McLeod; Eden Blackwell; Jerome R Kolbo; Lei Zhang; Olivia Hogan Ismail
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-06-03

9.  Contraceptive Procedures in Internal Medicine Clinics and Resident Education: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Methods, Barriers, and Facilitators.

Authors:  Rachel S Casas; Christine A Prifti; Alexandra E Bachorik; Heather Stuckey; Mindy Sobota; Cynthia H Chuang; Carol S Weisman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Evaluation of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative: A qualitative analysis of site leaders' implementation recommendations.

Authors:  Izidora Skračić; Amy B Lewin; Kevin M Roy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.