Literature DB >> 24863169

What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making.

Kyla Z Donnelly1, Tina C Foster2, Rachel Thompson3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to identify women's and health care providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making and counseling, respectively. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveys were administered online to convenience samples of 417 women and 188 contraceptive care providers residing in the United States. Participants were provided with a list of 34 questions related to the features of contraceptive options and rated the importance of each. Participants also ranked the questions in descending order of importance. For both women and providers, we calculated the mean importance rating for each question and the proportion that ranked each question in their three most important questions.
RESULTS: The average importance ratings given by women and providers were similar for 18 questions, but dissimilar for the remaining 16 questions. The question rated most important for women was "How does it work to prevent pregnancy?" whereas, for providers, "How often does a patient need to remember to use it?" and "How is it used?" were rated equally. The eight questions most frequently selected in the top three by women and/or providers were related to the safety of the method, mechanism of action, mode of use, side effects, typical- and perfect-use effectiveness, frequency of administration and when it begins to prevent pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): Although we found considerable concordance between women's and provider's information priorities, the presence of some inconsistencies highlights the importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling and, in particular, shared contraceptive decision making. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides insights into the information priorities of women for their contraceptive decision making and health care providers for contraceptive counseling. These insights are critical both to inform the development of decision support tools for implementation in contraceptive care and to guide the delivery of patient-centered care.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Family planning; Needs assessment; Patient education; Patient-centered care; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863169     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  23 in total

1.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Mary C Politi; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Oral contraceptive use and depression among adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah McKetta; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jessica Holttum; Ragini Maddipati; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Jeffrey F Peipert; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Training contraceptive providers to offer intrauterine devices and implants in contraceptive care: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thompson; Corinne H Rocca; Lisa Stern; Johanna Morfesis; Suzan Goodman; Jody Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?

Authors:  Suzan R Goodman; Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Courtney E Benedict; Jessica R Dieseldorff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Preliminary side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy.

Authors:  Heidi S Melbostad; Deborah S Wachtel; Kerstin A Lipke; Gary J Badger; Alexis K Matusiewicz; Catalina N Rey; Lauren K MacAfee; Anne K Dougherty; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review.

Authors:  Komal S Soin; Ping Teresa Yeh; Mary E Gaffield; Christina Ge; Caitlin E Kennedy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context.

Authors:  Carrie Purcell; Sharon Cameron; Julia Lawton; Anna Glasier; Jeni Harden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.