PURPOSE: To develop methods for characterizing materials used in screen-printed MRI coils and improve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with new lower-loss materials. METHODS: An experimental apparatus was created to characterize dielectric properties of plastic substrates used in receive coils. Coils were fabricated by screen printing conductive ink onto several plastic substrates. Unloaded and sample loaded quality factor (QUnloaded /QLoaded ) measurements and scans on a 3T scanner were used to characterize coil performance. An experimental method was developed to describe the relationship between a coil's QUnloaded and the SNR it provides in images of a phantom. In addition, 3T scans of a phantom and the head of a volunteer were obtained with a proof-of-concept printed eight-channel array, and the results were compared with a commercial 12-channel array. RESULTS: Printed coils with optimized substrates exhibited up to 97% of the image SNR when compared with a traditional coil on a loading phantom. QUnloaded and the SNR of coils were successfully correlated. The printed array resulted in images comparable to the quality given by the commercial array. CONCLUSION: Using the proposed methods and materials, the SNR of printed coils approached that of commercial coils while using a new fabrication technique that provided more flexibility and close contact with the patient's body. Magn Reson Med 78:775-783, 2017.
PURPOSE: To develop methods for characterizing materials used in screen-printed MRI coils and improve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with new lower-loss materials. METHODS: An experimental apparatus was created to characterize dielectric properties of plastic substrates used in receive coils. Coils were fabricated by screen printing conductive ink onto several plastic substrates. Unloaded and sample loaded quality factor (QUnloaded /QLoaded ) measurements and scans on a 3T scanner were used to characterize coil performance. An experimental method was developed to describe the relationship between a coil's QUnloaded and the SNR it provides in images of a phantom. In addition, 3T scans of a phantom and the head of a volunteer were obtained with a proof-of-concept printed eight-channel array, and the results were compared with a commercial 12-channel array. RESULTS: Printed coils with optimized substrates exhibited up to 97% of the image SNR when compared with a traditional coil on a loading phantom. QUnloaded and the SNR of coils were successfully correlated. The printed array resulted in images comparable to the quality given by the commercial array. CONCLUSION: Using the proposed methods and materials, the SNR of printed coils approached that of commercial coils while using a new fabrication technique that provided more flexibility and close contact with the patient's body. Magn Reson Med 78:775-783, 2017.
Authors: Dario Mager; Andreas Peter; Laura Del Tin; Elmar Fischer; Patrick J Smith; Jürgen Hennig; Jan G Korvink Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Boris Keil; James N Blau; Stephan Biber; Philipp Hoecht; Veneta Tountcheva; Kawin Setsompop; Christina Triantafyllou; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Joseph R Corea; Anita M Flynn; Balthazar Lechêne; Greig Scott; Galen D Reed; Peter J Shin; Michael Lustig; Ana C Arias Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Kelly Byron; Simone A Winkler; Fraser Robb; Shreyas Vasanawala; John Pauly; Greig Scott Journal: IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Bei Zhang; Bili Wang; Justin Ho; Shota Hodono; Christopher Burke; Riccardo Lattanzi; Markus Vester; Robert Rehner; Daniel Sodickson; Ryan Brown; Martijn Cloos Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Joseph Corea; Patrick Ye; Dongjin Seo; Kim Butts-Pauly; Ana Claudia Arias; Michael Lustig Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Bili Wang; Syed S Siddiq; Jerzy Walczyk; Mary Bruno; Iman Khodarahmi; Inge M Brinkmann; Robert Rehner; Karthik Lakshmanan; Jan Fritz; Ryan Brown Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.996