Literature DB >> 28253707

Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.

Daniel Fogerty1, William J Bologna2, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, Judy R Dubno2.   

Abstract

Fluctuating noise, common in everyday environments, has the potential to mask acoustic cues important for speech recognition. This study examined the extent to which acoustic cues for perception of vowels and stop consonants differ in their susceptibility to simultaneous and forward masking. Younger normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and older hearing-impaired adults identified initial and final consonants or vowels in noise-masked syllables that had been spectrally shaped. The amount of shaping was determined by subjects' audiometric thresholds. A second group of younger adults with normal hearing was tested with spectral shaping determined by the mean audiogram of the hearing-impaired group. Stimulus timing ensured that the final 10, 40, or 100 ms of the syllable occurred after the masker offset. Results demonstrated that participants benefited from short temporal delays between the noise and speech for vowel identification, but required longer delays for stop consonant identification. Older adults with normal and impaired hearing, with sufficient audibility, required longer delays to obtain performance equivalent to that of the younger adults. Overall, these results demonstrate that in forward masking conditions, younger listeners can successfully identify vowels during short temporal intervals (i.e., one unmasked pitch period), with longer durations required for consonants and for older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28253707      PMCID: PMC5848836          DOI: 10.1121/1.4976082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

Review 1.  Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pickora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Individual differences in auditory discrimination of spectral shape and speech-identification performance among elderly listeners.

Authors:  Mini N Shrivastav; Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improvements in estimating the harmonics-to-noise ratio of the voice.

Authors:  S N Awan; M L Frenkel
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Acoustic measures of temporal intervals across speaking rates: variability of syllable- and phrase-level relative timing.

Authors:  L Max; A J Caruso
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; D B Pisoni; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Judy R Dubno; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Robert C Mackinnon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of aging on identification of Mandarin consonants in normal and whisper registers.

Authors:  Min Xu; Jing Shao; Hongwei Ding; Lan Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.