Literature DB >> 27600118

[Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

M Funke1.   

Abstract

Advances in imaging of the female breast have substantially influenced the diagnosis and probably also the therapy and prognosis of breast cancer in the past few years. This article gives an overview of the most important imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Digital mammography is considered to be the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer. Digital breast tomosynthesis can increase the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and is used for the assessment of equivocal or suspicious mammography findings. Other modalities, such as ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play an important role in the diagnostics, staging and follow-up of breast cancer. Percutaneous needle biopsy is a rapid and minimally invasive method for the histological verification of breast cancer. New breast imaging modalities, such as contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, diffusion-weighted MRI and MR spectroscopy can possibly further improve breast cancer diagnostics; however, further studies are necessary to prove the advantages of these methods so that they cannot yet be recommended for routine clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27600118     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-016-0134-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  45 in total

Review 1.  Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Astrid Baur; Sonja D Bahrs; Sina Speck; Beate M Wietek; Bernhard Krämer; Ulrich Vogel; Claus D Claussen; Katja C Siegmann-Luz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  [Future of mammography-based imaging].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; T Wittenberg; T Michel; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; C Rauh; S M Jud; B Brehm; M Meier-Meitinger; G Anton; M Uder; P A Fasching
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Automated whole breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Stuart S Kaplan
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Simone Schrading; Martina Distelmaier; Timm Dirrichs; Sabine Detering; Liv Brolund; Kevin Strobel; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia: previously unexplored aspects assessed in 775 cases and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Gary L Bratthauer; Fattaneh A Tavassoli
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 8.  [New information on high risk breast screening].

Authors:  C C Riedl; L Ponhold; R Gruber; K Pinker; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Solveig Hofvind; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  [Invasive breast cancer: the current WHO classification].

Authors:  A Lebeau; M Kriegsmann; E Burandt; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Effect of Breast Size and Density in Turkish Women on Radiation Dose in Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Ayşegül İdil Soylu; Mesut Öztürk; Ahmet Veysel Polat
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 2.  Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Benjamin W Maloney; David M McClatchy; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Wendy A Wells; Richard J Barth
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Her2-Functionalized Gold-Nanoshelled Magnetic Hybrid Nanoparticles: a Theranostic Agent for Dual-Modal Imaging and Photothermal Therapy of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Qi Dong; Hong Yang; Caifeng Wan; Dongdong Zheng; Zhiguo Zhou; Shaowei Xie; Li Xu; Jing Du; Fenghua Li
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.703

4.  Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Carolla El Chamieh; Philippe Vielh; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 4.612

5.  Covid-19 Pandemic Impact on Breast Cancer Detection-The Major Effects Over an Early Diagnosis.

Authors:  Raluca-Elena Nica; Georgiana-Cristiana Camen; Mircea-Sebastian Şerbănescu; Lucian-Mihai Florescu; Ioana-Andreea Gheonea
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 6.  Breast Cancer-How Can Imaging Help?

Authors:  Roxana Iacob; Diana Luminita Manolescu; Emil Robert Stoicescu; Antonio Fabian; Daniel Malita; Cristian Oancea
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

7.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of breast cancer in MCF-7 orthotopic mice using gold nanoshelled poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanocapsules: a novel dual-targeted ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jing Du; Caifeng Wan; Yu Zhang; Shaowei Xie; Hongli Li; Hong Yang; Fenghua Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-03-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.