Literature DB >> 24570108

[Future of mammography-based imaging].

R Schulz-Wendtland1, T Wittenberg, T Michel, A Hartmann, M W Beckmann, C Rauh, S M Jud, B Brehm, M Meier-Meitinger, G Anton, M Uder, P A Fasching.   

Abstract

Mammography is the central diagnostic method for clinical diagnostics of breast cancer and the breast cancer screening program. In the clinical routine complementary methods, such as ultrasound, tomosynthesis and optional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are already combined for the diagnostic procedure. Future developments will utilize investigative procedures either as a hybrid (combination of several different imaging modalities in one instrument) or as a fusion method (the technical fusion of two or more of these methods) to implement fusion imaging into diagnostic algorithms. For screening there are reasonable hypotheses to aim for studies that individualize the diagnostic process within the screening procedure. Individual breast cancer risk prediction and individualized knowledge about sensitivity and specificity for certain diagnostic methods could be tested. The clinical implementation of these algorithms is not yet in sight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570108     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2578-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  59 in total

1.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  M J Michell; A Iqbal; R K Wasan; D R Evans; C Peacock; C P Lawinski; A Douiri; R Wilson; P Whelehan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Francesca Cavagnetto; Raffaella Rosasco; Giuseppe Rescinito; Francesco Monetti; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms.

Authors:  Torsten Hopp; Pascal Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Werner A Kaiser; Nicole V Ruiter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Honglin Song; Susan J Ramus; Maria Notaridou; Kate Lawrenson; Martin Widschwendter; Robert A Vierkant; Melissa C Larson; Susanne K Kjaer; Michael J Birrer; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen Schildkraut; Ian Tomlinson; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Linda S Cook; Jacek Gronwald; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Martin E Gore; Ian Campbell; Alice S Whittemore; Rebecca Sutphen; Catherine Phelan; Hoda Anton-Culver; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Diether Lambrechts; Mary Anne Rossing; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kirsten B Moysich; Marc T Goodman; Thilo Dörk; Heli Nevanlinna; Roberta B Ness; Thorunn Rafnar; Claus Hogdall; Estrid Hogdall; Brooke L Fridley; Julie M Cunningham; Weiva Sieh; Valerie McGuire; Andrew K Godwin; Daniel W Cramer; Dena Hernandez; Douglas Levine; Karen Lu; Edwin S Iversen; Rachel T Palmieri; Richard Houlston; Anne M van Altena; Katja K H Aben; Leon F A G Massuger; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Linda E Kelemen; Nhu D Le; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Krzysztof Medrek; Anne Stafford; Douglas F Easton; Jonathan Tyrer; Kelly L Bolton; Patricia Harrington; Diana Eccles; Ann Chen; Ashley N Molina; Barbara N Davila; Hector Arango; Ya-Yu Tsai; Zhihua Chen; Harvey A Risch; John McLaughlin; Steven A Narod; Argyrios Ziogas; Wendy Brewster; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Usha Menon; Anna H Wu; Daniel O Stram; Malcolm C Pike; Jonathan Beesley; Penelope M Webb; Xiaoqing Chen; Arif B Ekici; Falk C Thiel; Matthias W Beckmann; Hannah Yang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter A Fasching; Evelyn Despierre; Frederic Amant; Ignace Vergote; Jennifer Doherty; Rebecca Hein; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Galina Lurie; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Ingo Runnebaum; Peter Hillemanns; Matthias Dürst; Natalia Antonenkova; Natalia Bogdanova; Arto Leminen; Ralf Butzow; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kari Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Sören Besenbacher; Thomas A Sellers; Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.

Authors:  Matthias Elter; Alexander Horsch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Ulrik Lassen; Jann Mortensen; Søren Larsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bertelsen; Jesper Ravn; Paul Clementsen; Asbjørn Høgholm; Klaus Larsen; Torben Rasmussen; Susanne Keiding; Asger Dirksen; Oke Gerke; Birgit Skov; Ida Steffensen; Hanne Hansen; Peter Vilmann; Grete Jacobsen; Vibeke Backer; Niels Maltbaek; Jesper Pedersen; Henrik Madsen; Henrik Nielsen; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Biomarkers in Breast Cancer - An Update.

Authors:  M Schmidt; P A Fasching; M W Beckmann; H Kölbl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.915

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Standard Mammography Unit - Standard 3D Ultrasound Probe Fusion Prototype: First Results.

Authors:  Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian M Jud; Peter A Fasching; Arndt Hartmann; Marcus Radicke; Claudia Rauh; Michael Uder; Marius Wunderle; Paul Gass; Hanna Langemann; Matthias W Beckmann; Julius Emons
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Risk, Prediction and Prevention of Hereditary Breast Cancer - Large-Scale Genomic Studies in Times of Big and Smart Data.

Authors:  Marius Wunderle; Gregor Olmes; Naiba Nabieva; Lothar Häberle; Sebastian M Jud; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Carolin C Hack; Ramona Erber; Arif B Ekici; Juliane Hoyer; Georgia Vasileiou; Cornelia Kraus; André Reis; Arndt Hartmann; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Michael P Lux; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.915

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.