Literature DB >> 34651109

The Effect of Breast Size and Density in Turkish Women on Radiation Dose in Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Ayşegül İdil Soylu1, Mesut Öztürk2, Ahmet Veysel Polat1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to look into the relationship between breast size and mammographic breast density in women and breast radiation dose on full-field digital mammography (FFDM), as well as the factors that influence radiation dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 2,060 FFDM images from 515 consecutive participants. The participants were divided into two groups: those exposed to high doses (>3 mGy) and those exposed to low doses (<3 mGy). Moreover, the researchers analyzed the relationship between mean glandular dose (MGD) of the breast and patient age, compressed breast thickness, compression force, mammographic breast composition, and mammographic breast size.
RESULTS: The mean mammographic breast volume was 936.2 ± 425.2 (114.5-3,018) mL, and the mean compressed breast tissue thickness was 56.75 ± 10.44 mm. Moreover, the mean MGD in the high-dose group was 3.51 ± 0.48 mGy and 1.92 ± 0.56 mGy in the low-dose group. The high-dose group had greater breast thickness, diameters, volume, compression pressure, and surgical rate. However, the high-dose group was younger and had less dense breasts. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most important predictors of dose determination were breast thickness [odds ratio (OR): 1.178, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.156-1.200, p<0.001], history of previous surgery (OR: 2.210, 95% CI: 1.417-3.447, p<0.001), compression force (OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.004-1.013, p<0.001), and breast density (OR: 1.873, 95% CI: 1.359-2.580, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Women with larger breast volumes are subjected to higher doses of radiation. Therefore, breast-screening programs can be individualized to young women with larger breast volumes and women who have had breast-conserving surgery. ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast volume; mammography; radiation dose

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651109      PMCID: PMC8496124          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.6285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  31 in total

1.  Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.

Authors:  J Law; K Faulkner; K C Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography.

Authors:  Ayşegül Ozdemir
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  AAPM tutorial. Physics of mammography: image recording process.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Lin Ma; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Matthew R Jensen; Dana H Whaley; Fang Fang Wu; Serghei Malkov; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron D Norman; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.

Authors:  J E de Groot; M J M Broeders; W Branderhorst; G J den Heeten; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.

Authors:  Woutjan Branderhorst; Jerry E de Groot; Ralph Highnam; Ariane Chan; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mireille J M Broeders; Gerard J den Heeten; Cornelis A Grimbergen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Cancer following medical irradiation.

Authors:  J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.

Authors:  Ji Eun Baek; Bong Joo Kang; Sung Hun Kim; Hyun Sil Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Estimation of cancer risks during mammography procedure in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A Sulieman; O Serhan; H I Al-Mohammed; M Z Mahmoud; M Alkhorayef; B Alonazi; E Manssor; A Yousef
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.