Literature DB >> 30369108

Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery.

Benjamin W Maloney1, David M McClatchy1, Brian W Pogue1,2,3, Keith D Paulsen1,2,3, Wendy A Wells3,4, Richard J Barth.   

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is an effective treatment for early-stage cancers as long as the margins of the resected tissue are free of disease according to consensus guidelines for patient management. However, 15% to 35% of patients undergo a second surgery since malignant cells are found close to or at the margins of the original resection specimen. This review highlights imaging approaches being investigated to reduce the rate of positive margins, and they are reviewed with the assumption that a new system would need high sensitivity near 95% and specificity near 85%. The problem appears to be twofold. The first is for complete, fast surface scanning for cellular, structural, and/or molecular features of cancer, in a lumpectomy volume, which is variable in size, but can be large, irregular, and amorphous. A second is for full, volumetric imaging of the specimen at high spatial resolution, to better guide internal radiologic decision-making about the spiculations and duct tracks, which may inform that surfaces are involved. These two demands are not easily solved by a single tool. Optical methods that scan large surfaces quickly are needed with cellular/molecular sensitivity to solve the first problem, but volumetric imaging with high spatial resolution for soft tissues is largely outside of the optical realm and requires x-ray, micro-CT, or magnetic resonance imaging if they can be achieved efficiently. In summary, it appears that a combination of systems into hybrid platforms may be the optimal solution for these two very different problems. This concept must be cost-effective, image specimens within minutes and be coupled to decision-making tools that help a surgeon without adding to the procedure. The potential for optical systems to be involved in this problem is emerging and clinical trials are underway in several of these technologies to see if they could reduce positive margin rates in BCS. (2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast conserving surgery; imaging; lumpectomy; mammography; optical; spectroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30369108      PMCID: PMC6210801          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.100901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  102 in total

Review 1.  Nonlinear microscopy: new techniques and applications.

Authors:  Jerome Mertz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  MarginProbe: intraoperative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery by using radiofrequency spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marc Thill
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 3.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging--guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment.

Authors:  J E Tan; S G Orel; M D Schnall; D J Schultz; L J Solin
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 6.  Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.

Authors:  Cindy S Lee; Linda Moy; Sarah M Friedewald; Edward A Sickles; Debra L Monticciolo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; R W Kouides; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  High-resolution 3D micro-CT imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Inneke Willekens; Elke Van de Casteele; Nico Buls; Frederik Temmermans; Bart Jansen; Rudi Deklerck; Johan de Mey
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  29 in total

1.  Real-time diagnosis and visualization of tumor margins in excised breast specimens using fluorescence lifetime imaging and machine learning.

Authors:  Jakob Unger; Christoph Hebisch; Jennifer E Phipps; João L Lagarto; Hanna Kim; Morgan A Darrow; Richard J Bold; Laura Marcu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Broadband hyperspectral imaging for breast tumor detection using spectral and spatial information.

Authors:  Esther Kho; Behdad Dashtbozorg; Lisanne L de Boer; Koen K Van de Vijver; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Fundamentals and developments in fluorescence-guided cancer surgery.

Authors:  J Sven D Mieog; Friso B Achterberg; Aimen Zlitni; Merlijn Hutteman; Jacobus Burggraaf; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Sylvain Gioux; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Cysteine Cathepsins in Breast Cancer: Promising Targets for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Daan G J Linders; Okker D Bijlstra; Laura C Fallert; Denise E Hilling; Ethan Walker; Brian Straight; Taryn L March; A Rob P M Valentijn; Martin Pool; Jacobus Burggraaf; James P Basilion; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.484

5.  Automated assessment of breast margins in deep ultraviolet fluorescence images using texture analysis.

Authors:  Tongtong Lu; Julie M Jorns; Dong Hye Ye; Mollie Patton; Renee Fisher; Amanda Emmrich; Taly Gilat Schmidt; Tina Yen; Bing Yu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 6.  Registration Techniques for Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality Devices.

Authors:  Christopher M Andrews; Alexander B Henry; Ignacio M Soriano; Michael K Southworth; Jonathan R Silva
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 7.  Image-guided tumor surgery: The emerging role of nanotechnology.

Authors:  Nicholas E Wojtynek; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-03-11

8.  Intraoperative fluorescence imaging with aminolevulinic acid detects grossly occult breast cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Ottolino-Perry; Anam Shahid; Stephanie DeLuca; Viktor Son; Mayleen Sukhram; Fannong Meng; Zhihui Amy Liu; Sara Rapic; Nayana Thalanki Anantha; Shirley C Wang; Emilie Chamma; Christopher Gibson; Philip J Medeiros; Safa Majeed; Ashley Chu; Olivia Wignall; Alessandra Pizzolato; Cheryl F Rosen; Liis Lindvere Teene; Danielle Starr-Dunham; Iris Kulbatski; Tony Panzarella; Susan J Done; Alexandra M Easson; Wey L Leong; Ralph S DaCosta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Intraoperative Specimen Ultrasonography: Is It a Reliable Tool for Margin Assessment Following Breast Conservation Surgery for Breast Carcinoma?

Authors:  Niranjan Kumar; Megha Tandon; Chintamani Chintamani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-21

10.  Optical scatter imaging of resected breast tumor structures matches the patterns of micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Samuel S Streeter; Benjamin W Maloney; Rebecca A Zuurbier; Wendy A Wells; Richard J Barth; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.