Literature DB >> 20956821

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Constance D Lehman1.   

Abstract

Before 2000, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered a relatively poor imaging tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), as a high percentage of false-negative magnetic resonance examinations were cases of DCIS. Three specific shifts in breast MRI occurred, which changed this assessment: 1) a shift from high temporal to high spatial imaging, revealing specific morphological features on MRI suspicious for DCIS; 2) a shift from diagnostic studies of patients with cancers identified on mammography to screening studies of high-risk patients, allowing more accurate comparisons of mammography vs MRI in detecting the full spectrum of breast cancers regardless of appearance on mammography; and 3) a shift from emphasis on masses to improved understanding of features of non-mass-like malignant lesions, distinct from benign background parenchymal enhancement patterns. Over the last decade, research has confirmed that of all imaging tools, MRI has the highest sensitivity in detection of DCIS (compared with mammography and ultrasound). Future studies are needed to clarify how best to use this tool for improved patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20956821      PMCID: PMC5161071          DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  17 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images?

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors.

Authors:  C Boetes; S P Strijk; R Holland; J O Barentsz; R F Van Der Sluis; J H Ruijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Lorena Gutierrez; Moriel S NessAiver; W Bradford Carter; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca S Lewis; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Eric L Rosen; Stacy A Smith-Foley; Wendy B DeMartini; Peter R Eby; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Tatjana Paunesku; Xiaobing Fan; Gayle E Woloschak; Stefan Vogt; Suzanne D Conzen; Thomas Krausz; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  21 in total

1.  Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7 T.

Authors:  K Pinker; W Bogner; P Baltzer; S Trattnig; S Gruber; O Abeyakoon; M Bernathova; O Zaric; P Dubsky; Z Bago-Horvath; M Weber; D Leithner; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Peter R Eby; Wendy B Demartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Liuquan Cheng; Yuhan Bai; Jing Zhang; Mei Liu; Xiru Li; Ailiang Zhang; Xiaojing Zhang; Lin Ma
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-02-10

Review 4.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Advances in Breast MRI in the Setting of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Diana L Lam; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 0.800

6.  The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Management of Women with Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Jacob Smith; Savannah C Partridge; Adrienne Kim; Sara H Javid; Daniel S Hippe; Constance D Lehman; Janie M Lee; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Feasibility of Intraoperative Breast MRI and the Role of Prone Versus Supine Positioning in Surgical Planning for Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Melissa A Mallory; Yasuaki Sagara; Fatih Aydogan; Stephen DeSantis; Jagadeesan Jayender; Diana Caragacianu; Eva Gombos; Kirby G Vosburgh; Ferenc A Jolesz; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.

Authors:  Heinrich F Magometschnigg; Pascal A Baltzer; Barbara Fueger; Thomas H Helbich; Georgios Karanikas; Peter Dubsky; Margaretha Rudas; Michael Weber; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xiaoxue Li; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Xuelin Huang; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Rinaa S Punglia; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Microcalcifications in 1657 Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Correlation with Clinical, Histopathologic, Biologic Features, and Local Recurrence.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Brian P Hobbs; Henry M Kuerer; Marion E Scoggins; Ana P Benveniste; Young Mi Park; Abigail S Caudle; Patricia S Fox; Benjamin D Smith; Beatriz E Adrada; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.