Literature DB >> 27596847

[Individualized evidence-based interventional stone treatment : One stone, many question marks?]

T Bach1, T Knoll2.   

Abstract

The treatment of urolithiasis is still one of the most frequent tasks in the daily urological practice. Driven by the technological developments, patient demands and also personal experiences of urologists, many interventional treatment options have been established. To identify the most suitable treatment option, it is of utmost importance to consider not only stone size and localization but also the individual situation of the patient and the published evidence, which despite all efforts often lags behind the technical and clinical reality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Nephrolithiasis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Shockwave lithotripsy, extracorporeal; Ureterorenoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27596847     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  15 in total

Review 1.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Manoj Monga; Slawomir G Kata; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education.

Authors:  O F Miller; C J Kane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso; M Ficazzola
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The natural history of nonobstructing asymptomatic renal stones managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Benjamin M Dropkin; Rachel A Moses; Devang Sharma; Vernon M Pais
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Outcomes of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Andreas J Gross; Alfred Krebs; Dogan Unal; Eduardo Bercowsky; Ehab Eltahawy; Bhaskar Somani; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications?

Authors:  M H Ather; B Shrestha; A Mehmood
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi.

Authors:  Daniel T Oberlin; Andrew S Flum; Laurie Bachrach; Richard S Matulewicz; Sarah C Flury
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Economic Aspects of Morbidity Caused by Ureteral Stents.

Authors:  Sergej E L Staubli; Livio Mordasini; Daniel Stephan Engeler; Rafael Sauter; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  International Collaboration in Endourology: Multicenter Evaluation of Prestenting for Ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Jan Peter Jessen; Alberto Breda; Marianne Brehmer; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Felix Millan Rodriguez; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Cesare Marco Scoffone; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  ["We're going to place a ureteral stent …" : Development and use of the terms stent and splint by German-speaking urologists].

Authors:  Friedrich H Moll; Joachim Leissner; Thorsten Halling
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.