OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic burden of temporary ureteral stenting. METHODS: The German version of the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire was completed by 74 patients with unilateral inserted indwelling stents. Cost accounting was performed considering the costs of ureteral stents, drugs, consultation of healthcare professionals, hospitalization, stent extraction and work incapacity due to stent-related problems. RESULTS: Total costs arising from stent-related problems amounted to US dollars (USD) 133,355, median USD 455 (113-11,948) for the entire stent indwelling time, and USD 15 (4-398) per patient per day. Costs (USD total/median (range)) arose mainly from work incapacity (104,154/0 (0-11, 498)), followed by healthcare professional consultation (9,177/0 (0-612)), drug costs (8,736/111 (0-427)), stent material (8,390/113), stent removal (2,235/0 (0-1,769)) and outpatient hospital care (663/0 (0-663)). Most patients also showed a reduced capacity for work due to symptoms associated with indwelling stents. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of morbidity associated with indwelling ureteral stents is considerably high and should be taken into account when performing ureteral stenting, especially in cases where it is not strictly indicated and when stent removal is scheduled.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic burden of temporary ureteral stenting. METHODS: The German version of the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire was completed by 74 patients with unilateral inserted indwelling stents. Cost accounting was performed considering the costs of ureteral stents, drugs, consultation of healthcare professionals, hospitalization, stent extraction and work incapacity due to stent-related problems. RESULTS: Total costs arising from stent-related problems amounted to US dollars (USD) 133,355, median USD 455 (113-11,948) for the entire stent indwelling time, and USD 15 (4-398) per patient per day. Costs (USD total/median (range)) arose mainly from work incapacity (104,154/0 (0-11, 498)), followed by healthcare professional consultation (9,177/0 (0-612)), drug costs (8,736/111 (0-427)), stent material (8,390/113), stent removal (2,235/0 (0-1,769)) and outpatient hospital care (663/0 (0-663)). Most patients also showed a reduced capacity for work due to symptoms associated with indwelling stents. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of morbidity associated with indwelling ureteral stents is considerably high and should be taken into account when performing ureteral stenting, especially in cases where it is not strictly indicated and when stent removal is scheduled.
Authors: Spencer C Hiller; Stephanie Daignault-Newton; Ivan Rakic; Susan Linsell; Bronson Conrado; S Mohammad Jafri; Ronald Rubenstein; Mazen Abdelhady; C Peter Fischer; Elena Gimenez; Richard Sarle; William W Roberts; Conrad Maitland; Rafid Yousif; Robert Elgin; Laris Galejs; Jeremy Konheim; David Leavitt; Eric Stockall; J Rene Fontera; J Stuart Wolf; John M Hollingsworth; Casey A Dauw; Khurshid R Ghani Journal: Urol Pract Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Dominik Abt; Kristina Dötzer; Patrick Honek; Karolina Müller; Daniel Stephan Engeler; Maximilian Burger; Hans-Peter Schmid; Thomas Knoll; Francesco Sanguedolce; Hrishi B Joshi; Hans-Martin Fritsche Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Matthias T Buhmann; Dominik Abt; Oliver Nolte; Thomas R Neu; Sebastian Strempel; Werner C Albrich; Patrick Betschart; Valentin Zumstein; Antonia Neels; Katharina Maniura-Weber; Qun Ren Journal: Microbiome Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Nikita R Bhatt; Kenneth MacKenzie; Taimur T Shah; Kevin Gallagher; Keiran Clement; William A Cambridge; Meghana Kulkarni; Graeme MacLennan; Rustom P Manecksha; Oliver J Wiseman; Samuel Mcclinton; Daron Smith; Veeru Kasivisvanathan Journal: BJUI Compass Date: 2020-10-08