Literature DB >> 10569534

Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.

M Grasso1, M Ficazzola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contemporary treatment of lower pole renal calculi includes extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and retrograde ureteropyeloscopy. Success rates for shock wave lithotripsy are reduced in this setting, especially for stones greater than 1 cm. and/or in patients with anatomical variants. Percutaneous treatment, although effective, subjects the patient to increased morbidity. We studied the safety and efficacy of retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole intrarenal calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 90 stone burdens localized to the lower pole and treated with a small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscope and a 200 micron holmium laser fiber. Stone burdens were classified as group 1--10 or less, group 2--11 to 20 and group 3--greater than 20 mm. in largest diameter. Patients with calculi less than 2.5 cm. were treated as outpatients unless concurrent medical conditions required hospitalization. Larger stones and partial staghorn calculi (group 3) frequently required 2-stage endoscopic procedures with retrograde intrarenal irrigation for 36 hours to clear debris. An acceptable immediate surgical outcome was defined as complete fragmentation reducing the stone burden to dust and 2 mm. or less fragments. Success was defined as clear imaging (that is stone-free) on renal sonography with minimum 3-month followup. Extreme anatomical variants, including a long infundibulum, acute infundibulopelvic angle and a dilated collecting system, were noted and correlated with surgical failures.
RESULTS: Endoscopic access and complete stone fragmentation were achieved in 94, 95 and 45% of groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. After a second treatment the success rate increased to 82% in group 3, with an overall rate of 91%. Of the 19 surgical failures 8 were secondary to inability to access the lower pole and 11 were secondary to inability to render the patient stone-free. In 2 of the 19 cases infundibular strictures hindered ureteroscopic access. In addition, of the anatomical variants a long lower pole infundibulum was the most statistically significant predictor of failure. Mean operative time ranged from 38 minutes for small to 126 for the largest calculi. There were no major complications. Overall stone-free rates with minimum 3-month followup were 82, 71 and 65% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and 88, 77 and 81%, respectively, in patients with an acceptable initial surgical outcome (that is excluding those with access failures from analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy is a safe and effective surgical treatment for lower pole intrarenal calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10569534     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  37 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Authors:  Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopcu; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; Ömer Sarılar; Murat Binbay; Gökhan Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

3.  A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nihat Karakoyunlu; Goksel Goktug; Nevzat Can Şener; Kursad Zengin; Ismail Nalbant; Ufuk Ozturk; Ugur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Lim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

7.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm.

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Lutfi Tunc; Cagri Guneri; Ali Unsal; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Lower pole calculi larger than one centimeter: Retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

9.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter.

Authors:  Hemendra Navinchandra Shah
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

10.  Flexible ureteroscopy update: indications, instrumentation and technical advances.

Authors:  Srinivas Rajamahanty; Michael Grasso
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.