Literature DB >> 18294029

How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Hans-Göran Tiselius1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of ureteral stones with two modern lithotripters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 598 patients with ureteral stones was treated with the Modulith SLX Classic and Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripters. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 54 (17) years, and the mean (SD) stone surface area was 42 (34) mm2. Results were available for 580 patients.
RESULTS: Stone-free ureters were recorded in 563 (97.1%) patients. Stone-free rates were 96.1%, 97.8%, and 97.9%, for the proximal, middle, and distal ureter, respectively. The average number of SWL sessions needed was 1.31. For the proximal, middle, and distal ureter, one SWL session was sufficient in 73.1%, 66.7%, and 83.2% of patients, respectively. Assisting auxiliary procedures were used in 102 patients (18%). The total mean (SD) treatment time was 48 (26) minutes and the mean (SD) number of shockwaves was 3266 (2258). SWL for stones located in the proximal, middle, and distal ureter was carried out in the prone position in 38%, 88%, and 9%, respectively. For 90 patients primarily treated with a large focus, the re-treatment rate was the same as for patients treated with a standard focus. A stone treatment index used to assess the efforts, results, and complications was similar for the two lithotripters and for all stone locations. Thus both lithotripters had similar efficacy.
CONCLUSION: With consistent use of SWL, a stone-free rate of more than 97% can be attained, with a reasonable re-treatment rate and only modest use of assisting auxiliary procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294029     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  22 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future.

Authors:  José Manuel Reis Santos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations.

Authors:  Anna E Wright; Nicholas J Rukin; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Shuzo Hamamoto; Rei Unno; Kazumi Taguchi; Taku Naiki; Ryosuke Ando; Atsushi Okada; Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Mostafa AbdelRazek; Kenjiro Kohri; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Evaluation of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system as a predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Hasan Anıl Atalay; Lutfi Canat; Recep Bayraktarlı; Ilter Alkan; Osman Can; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  [Management of ureteral stones].

Authors:  M Straub; M Bader; F Strittmatter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Helene Jung; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Influence of ureter stenting before ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi].

Authors:  J Mueller; N Riechert-Mühe; A J Schrader; A Leitenberger; J Steinestel; M A Kuczyk; S Steffens; R Hofmann; J Sotelino
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?

Authors:  Onur Dede; Nevzat Can Şener; Okan Baş; Gülay Dede; Muhammet Şahin Bağbancı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.