Literature DB >> 25463995

The natural history of nonobstructing asymptomatic renal stones managed with active surveillance.

Benjamin M Dropkin1, Rachel A Moses2, Devang Sharma3, Vernon M Pais4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We documented the natural history of asymptomatic nonobstructing renal calculi managed with active surveillance and explored factors predicting stone related events to better inform shared decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with asymptomatic nonobstructing renal calculi electing active surveillance of their stone(s) were retrospectively reviewed. Stone characteristics, patient characteristics, and stone related events were collected. We evaluated the effects of stone size and location on development of symptoms, spontaneous passage, requirement for surgical intervention, and stone growth.
RESULTS: We identified 160 stones with an average size of 7.0 ± 4.2 mm among 110 patients with average followup of 41 ± 19 months. Forty-five (28% of total) stones caused symptoms during followup. Notably 3 stones (3% of asymptomatic subgroup, 2% of total stones) caused painless silent obstruction necessitating intervention after an average of 37 ± 17 months. The only significant predictor of spontaneous passage or symptom development was location. Upper pole/mid renal stones were more likely than lower pole stones to become symptomatic (40.6% vs 24.3%, p = 0.047) and to pass spontaneously (14.5% vs 2.9%, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Among asymptomatic nonobstructing renal calculi managed with active surveillance, most remained asymptomatic through an average followup of more than 3 years. Less than 30% caused renal colic, less than 20% were operated on for pain and 7% spontaneously passed. Lower poles stones were significantly less likely to cause symptoms or pass spontaneously. Despite 3 stones causing silent hydronephrosis suggestive of obstruction, regular followup imaging facilitated interventions that prevented renal loss.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asymptomatic diseases; kidney calculi; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463995     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Symptomatic and Radiographic Manifestations of Kidney Stone Recurrence and Their Prediction by Risk Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Matthew R D'Costa; William E Haley; Kristin C Mara; Felicity T Enders; Terri J Vrtiska; Vernon M Pais; Steven J Jacobsen; Cynthia H McCollough; John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  [Individualized evidence-based interventional stone treatment : One stone, many question marks?]

Authors:  T Bach; T Knoll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

5.  Contrast-enhanced or noncontrast CT for renal colic: utilizing urinalysis and patient history of urolithiasis to decide.

Authors:  Vishal Desai; Mougnyan Cox; Sandeep Deshmukh; Christopher G Roth
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20

6.  Prevalence of Urolithiasis by Ultrasonography Among Patients with Gout: A Cross-Sectional Study from the UP-Philippine General Hospital.

Authors:  Michael Tee; Ceferino Lustre Ii; Aedrian Abrilla; Ivy Elline Afos; Johanna Patricia Cañal
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-09-25

7.  Difference of opinion - Asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm: to treat or not to treat? Opinion: Treat.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Difference of opinion - Asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm: to treat or not to treat? Opinion: Do not treat.

Authors:  Wesley W Ludwig; Justin B Ziemba; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Preoperative Localization for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Donovan Tay; Jeeban P Das; Randy Yeh
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-04-06

10.  Nephrolithiasis, stone composition, meteorology, and seasons in Malta: Is there any connection?

Authors:  Jesmar Buttigieg; Stephanie Attard; Alexander Carachi; Ruth Galea; Stephen Fava
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.