Literature DB >> 25219700

Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi.

Daniel T Oberlin1, Andrew S Flum1, Laurie Bachrach1, Richard S Matulewicz1, Sarah C Flury2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Upper tract nephrolithiasis is a common surgical condition that is treated with multiple surgical techniques, including shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We analyzed case logs submitted to the ABU by candidates for initial certification and recertification to help elucidate the trends in management of upper tract urinary calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Annualized case logs from 2003 to 2012 were analyzed. We used logistic regression models to assess how surgeon specific attributes affected the way that upper tract stones were treated. Cases were identified by the CPT code of the corresponding procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 6,620 urologists in 3 certification groups recorded case logs, including 2,275 for initial certification, 2,381 for first recertification and 1,964 for second recertification. A total of 441,162 procedures were logged, of which 54.2% were ureteroscopy, 41.3% were shock wave lithotripsy and 4.5% were percutaneous nephrolithotomy. From 2003 to 2013 there was an increase in ureteroscopy from 40.9% to 59.6% and a corresponding decrease in shock wave lithotripsy from 54% to 36.3%. For new urologists ureteroscopy increased from 47.6% to 70.9% of all stones cases logged and for senior clinicians ureteroscopy increased from 40% to 55%. Endourologists performed a significantly higher proportion of percutaneous nephrolithotomies than nonendourologists (10.6% vs 3.69%, p <0.0001) and a significantly smaller proportion of shock wave lithotripsies (34.2% vs 42.2%, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Junior and senior clinicians showed a dramatic adoption of endoscopic techniques. Treatment of upper tract calculi is an evolving field and provider specific attributes affect how these stones are treated.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lithotripsy; nephrostomy; percutaneous; physician's practice patterns; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25219700     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly.

Authors:  Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Deng He; Lei Cui; Jiaqiao Zhang; Zhenyu Zhao; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Feng Lin; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Stones in 2015: Changes in stone management - suspending belief for evidence.

Authors:  Sapan N Ambani; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Ureteral stenting practices following routine ureteroscopy: an international survey.

Authors:  Jorge F Pereira; Paul Bower; Eric Jung; Egor Parkhomenko; Timothy Tran; Simone Thavaseelan; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Interventional Radiology-Operated Endoscopy: Indications, Implementation, and Innovation.

Authors:  Ravi N Srinivasa; Rudra Pampati; Nishant Patel; Rajiv N Srinivasa; Anthony N Hage; Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  [Individualized evidence-based interventional stone treatment : One stone, many question marks?]

Authors:  T Bach; T Knoll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Endoscopic Evidence That Randall's Plaque is Associated with Surface Erosion of the Renal Papilla.

Authors:  Andrew J Cohen; Michael S Borofsky; Blake B Anderson; Casey A Dauw; Daniel L Gillen; Glenn S Gerber; Elaine M Worcester; Fredric L Coe; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Combined Burst Wave Lithotripsy and Ultrasonic Propulsion for Improved Urinary Stone Fragmentation.

Authors:  Theresa A Zwaschka; Justin S Ahn; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.