Literature DB >> 27545081

Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Hadley L Sis1, Erin M Mannen2, Benjamin M Wong1, Eileen S Cadel1, Mary L Bouxsein3, Dennis E Anderson3, Elizabeth A Friis4.   

Abstract

Researchers have reported on the importance of the rib cage in maintaining mechanical stability in the thoracic spine and on the validity of a compressive follower preload. However, dynamic mechanical testing using both the rib cage and follower load has never been studied. An in vitro biomechanical study of human cadaveric thoracic specimens with rib cage intact in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under varying compressive follower preloads was performed. The objective was to characterize the motion and stiffness of the thoracic spine with intact rib cage and follower preload. The hypotheses tested for all modes of bending were (i) range of motion, elastic zone, and neutral zone will be reduced with a follower load, and (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness will be increased with a follower load. Eight human cadaveric thoracic spine specimen (T1-T12) with intact rib cage were subjected to 5Nm pure moments in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under follower loads of 0-400N. Range of motion, elastic and neutral zones, and elastic and neutral zone stiffness values were calculated for functional spinal units and segments within the entire thoracic section. Combined segmental range of motion decreased by an average of 34% with follower load for every mode. Application of a follower load with intact rib cage impacts the motion and stiffness of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Researchers should consider including both aspects to better represent the physiologic implications of human motion and improve clinically relevant biomechanical thoracic spine testing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Follower load; Rib cage; Thoracic spine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27545081      PMCID: PMC5702885          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  18 in total

1.  Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; A J Ghanayem; H Diener; K P Meade; B Dunlap; S D Hodges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; K P Meade; B Lee; B Dunlap
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Clinical spinal instability and low back pain.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Flexion-extension response of the thoracolumbar spine under compressive follower preload.

Authors:  Scott K Stanley; Alexander J Ghanayem; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Odysseas Paxinos; Gerard Carandang; Michael R Zindrick; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability.

Authors:  Leonardo B C Brasiliense; Bruno C R Lazaro; Phillip M Reyes; Seref Dogan; Nicholas Theodore; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Robert Watkins; Robert Watkins; Lytton Williams; Scott Ahlbrand; Ryan Garcia; Ara Karamanian; Lorra Sharp; Chuong Vo; Thomas Hedman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.

Authors:  Susan M Renner; Raghu N Natarajan; Avinash G Patwardhan; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Bev Y Guo; Gunnar B J Andersson; Howard S An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18
View more
  9 in total

1.  The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; Elizabeth A Friis; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-16

2.  Kinematic evaluation of thoracic spinal cord sagittal diameter and the space available for cord using weight-bearing kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Permsak Paholpak; Aidin Abedi; Rattanaporn Chamnan; Kunlavit Chantarasirirat; Koji Tamai; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Erin M Mannen; Rebecca Tromp; Benjamin M Wong; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Elizabeth A Friis; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The rib cage stabilizes the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using stepwise reduction of rib cage structures.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Nicolas Graf; Konrad Appelt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The strain distribution in the lumbar anterior longitudinal ligament is affected by the loading condition and bony features: An in vitro full-field analysis.

Authors:  Marco Palanca; Maria Luisa Ruspi; Luca Cristofolini; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Luigi La Barbera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Biomechanical influence of the surgical approaches, implant length and density in stabilizing ankylosing spondylitis cervical spine fracture.

Authors:  Yaoyao Liu; Zhong Wang; Mingyong Liu; Xiang Yin; Jiming Liu; Jianhua Zhao; Peng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Finite Element Analysis of Long Posterior Transpedicular Instrumentation for Cervicothoracic Fractures Related to Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Viktor Lison Almkvist; Claes Olerud; Peter Halldin; Madelen Fahlstedt
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.