Literature DB >> 29106896

The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments.

Dennis E Anderson1, Erin M Mannen2, Rebecca Tromp3, Benjamin M Wong4, Hadley L Sis4, Eileen S Cadel4, Elizabeth A Friis4, Mary L Bouxsein5.   

Abstract

The effects of the rib cage on thoracic spine loading are not well studied, but the rib cage may provide stability or share loads with the spine. Intervertebral disc pressure provides insight into spinal loading, but such measurements are lacking in the thoracic spine. Thus, our objective was to examine thoracic intradiscal pressures under applied pure moments, and to determine the effect of the rib cage on these pressures. Human cadaveric thoracic spine specimens were positioned upright in a testing machine, and Dynamic pure moments (0 to ±5 N·m) with a compressive follower load of 400 N were applied in axial rotation, flexion - extension, and lateral bending. Disc pressures were measured at T4-T5 and T8-T9 using needle-mounted pressure transducers, first with the rib cage intact, and again after the rib cage was removed. Changes in pressure vs. moment slopes with rib cage removal were examined. Pressure generally increased with applied moments, and pressure-moment slope increased with rib cage removal at T4-T5 for axial rotation, extension, and lateral bending, and at T8-T9 for axial rotation. The results suggest the intact rib cage carried about 62% and 56% of axial rotation moments about T4-T5 and T8-T9, respectively, as well as 42% of extension moment and 36-43% of lateral bending moment about T4-T5 only. The rib cage likely plays a larger role in supporting moments than compressive loads, and may also play a larger role in the upper thorax than the lower thorax.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follower load; Intervertebral disc pressure; Mechanical testing; Pure moment; Rib cage; Thoracic spine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29106896      PMCID: PMC6193557          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines.

Authors:  P Pollintine; A S Przybyla; P Dolan; M A Adams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material.

Authors:  A NACHEMSON
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1960

3.  Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Robert Watkins; Robert Watkins; Lytton Williams; Scott Ahlbrand; Ryan Garcia; Ara Karamanian; Lorra Sharp; Chuong Vo; Thomas Hedman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  M A Adams; D W McMillan; T P Green; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Mechanical analysis of the human cadaveric thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; John T Anderson; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Subject-specific biomechanics of trunk: musculoskeletal scaling, internal loads and intradiscal pressure estimation.

Authors:  F Ghezelbash; A Shirazi-Adl; N Arjmand; Z El-Ouaaid; A Plamondon
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-05-12

7.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Growth-Friendly Rod Construct.

Authors:  Sarah Galvis; Josh Arnold; Erin Mannen; Benjamin Wong; Hadley Sis; Eileen Cadel; John Anderson; Dennis Anderson; Paul Arnold; Elizabeth Friis
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2017-01

8.  Intervertebral disc decompression following endplate damage: implications for disc degeneration depend on spinal level and age.

Authors:  Patricia Dolan; Jin Luo; Phillip Pollintine; Priyan R Landham; Manos Stefanakis; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  In vitro disc pressure profiles below scoliosis fusion constructs.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  6 in total

1.  The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; Elizabeth A Friis; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 2.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Is T9-11 the true thoracolumbar transition zone?

Authors:  J Murphy; E McLoughlin; A M Davies; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-10

4.  Influence of Rib Cage on Static Characteristics of Scoliotic Spine.

Authors:  Liying Lin; Shaowei Jia; Hufei Yang; Ye Li; Shunxin Zhang; Jie Fan; Li Han
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 1.781

5.  How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  The influence of the rib cage on the static and dynamic stability responses of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Shaowei Jia; Liying Lin; Hufei Yang; Jie Fan; Shunxin Zhang; Li Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.