Literature DB >> 10851105

Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

A G Patwardhan1, R M Havey, A J Ghanayem, H Diener, K P Meade, B Dunlap, S D Hodges.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An experimental approach was used to test human cadaveric cervical spine specimens.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the response of the cervical spine to a compressive follower load applied along a path that approximates the tangent to the curve of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The compressive load on the human cervical spine is estimated to range from 120 to 1200 N during activities of daily living. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles at approximately 10 N. Differences between the estimated in vivo loads and the ex vivo load-carrying capacity have not been satisfactorily explained.
METHODS: A new experimental technique was developed for applying a compressive follower load of physiologic magnitudes up to 250 N. The experimental technique applied loads that minimized the internal shear forces and bending moments, loading the specimen in nearly pure compression.
RESULTS: A compressive vertical load applied in the neutral and forward-flexed postures caused large changes in cervical lordosis at small load magnitudes. The specimen collapsed in extension or flexion at a load of less than 40 N. In sharp contrast, the cervical spine supported a load of up to 250 N without damage or instability in both the sagittal and frontal planes when the load path was tangential to the spinal curve. The cervical spine was significantly less flexible under a compressive follower load compared with the hypermobility demonstrated under a compressive vertical load (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The load-carrying capacity of the ligamentous cervical spine sharply increased under a compressive follower load. This experiment explains how a whole cervical spine can be lordotic and yet withstand the large compressive loads estimated in vivo without damage or instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10851105     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  In vitro evaluation of translating and rotating plates using a robot testing system under follower load.

Authors:  Y Yan; K M Bell; R A Hartman; J Hu; W Wang; J D Kang; J Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; S Ito; P A Cripton; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of an interfacet joint decompression and stabilization system.

Authors:  Jeremi M Leasure; Jenni Buckley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Subject-specific inverse dynamics of the head and cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; Elizabeth A Friis; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-16

8.  Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sophie Campana; Sylvain Persohn; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Role of posterior elements in the disc bulging of a degenerated cervical spine.

Authors:  Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Kris Siemionow; David Drucker; Ashish Upadhyay; Priyesh Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-02

10.  Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Sylvain Persohn; Sophie Campana; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.