Literature DB >> 30250227

Kinematic evaluation of thoracic spinal cord sagittal diameter and the space available for cord using weight-bearing kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

Permsak Paholpak1,2, Aidin Abedi1, Rattanaporn Chamnan1,3, Kunlavit Chantarasirirat1,4, Koji Tamai1,5, Zorica Buser6, Jeffrey C Wang1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective kinematic MRI (kMRI) study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamic changes of thoracic anterior and posterior space available for cord (SAC), and thoracic spinal cord in the dural sac in three positions.
SETTING: Expert MRI, Bellflower California; and University of Southern California, in Los Angeles, USA.
METHODS: A total of 118 patients (66 males and 52 females, mean age ( ± SD) of 45.6 ± 10.6 years) who underwent thoracic spine kMRI were evaluated from T4-5 to T11-12 in flexion, neutral, and extension positions. The anterior SAC, posterior SAC, and mid-sagittal thoracic cord diameter were measured at each level from T4-5 to T11-12. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were analyzed.
RESULTS: The anterior SAC was significantly narrower in flexion position compared with other positions at T8-9 to T11-12 levels (p < 0.01). The T8-9 level had significantly wider posterior SAC in flexion and extension positions compared with the neutral position (p < 0.005). However, the posterior SAC at T9-10 was narrower in extension than the neutral position (p = 0.002). Thoracic spinal cord diameter significantly increased in flexion position when compared with the neutral position at T8-9, T9-10, and T11-12 levels (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic spinal cord had dynamic changes with positions. In flexion position, the thoracic cord at T8-9 and below tended to move anteriorly, getting closer to the vertebral body and intervertebral disc. The mid-sagittal diameter of the thoracic cord increased in flexion position at the levels below T8-9. In the presence of lesions in anterior epidural space, the risk of spinal cord compression is higher in flexion position, especially at levels below T8-9.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30250227     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-018-0198-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  16 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the cross-sectional area of the dural sac and spinal cord in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Daigo Morita; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Hiroaki Nakashima; Keigo Ito; Go Yoshida; Masaaki Machino; Syunsuke Kanbara; Toshiki Iwase; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Robert Watkins; Robert Watkins; Lytton Williams; Scott Ahlbrand; Ryan Garcia; Ara Karamanian; Lorra Sharp; Chuong Vo; Thomas Hedman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The natural history of thoracic disc herniation.

Authors:  C W Brown; P A Deffer; J Akmakjian; D H Donaldson; J L Brugman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Range of motion of thoracic spine in sagittal plane.

Authors:  Daigo Morita; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Hiroaki Nakashima; Keigo Ito; Go Yoshida; Masaaki Machino; Syunsuke Kanbara; Toshiki Iwase; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Herniated thoracic disks.

Authors:  C A Arce; G J Dohrmann
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Effect of cervical kyphotic deformity type on the motion characteristics and dynamic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Monchai Ruangchainikom; Michael D Daubs; Akinobu Suzuki; Tetsuo Hayashi; Gil Weintraub; Christopher J Lee; Hirokazu Inoue; Haijun Tian; Bayan Aghdasi; Trevor P Scott; Kevin H Phan; Areesak Chotivichit; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Thoracic spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  G H Barnett; R W Hardy; J R Little; J W Bay; G W Sypert
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Kinematic analysis of diseased and adjacent segments in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kevin H Phan; Michael D Daubs; Asher I Kupperman; Trevor P Scott; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anterior Versus Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Thoracic Spine Diseases: A Comparison of Complications.

Authors:  Aidin Abedi; Blake Formanek; Raymond Hah; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.