Literature DB >> 16843473

Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.

Susan M Renner1, Raghu N Natarajan, Avinash G Patwardhan, Robert M Havey, Leonard I Voronov, Bev Y Guo, Gunnar B J Andersson, Howard S An.   

Abstract

A 3-D finite element model (FEM) of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) was used to determine the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions (ROM) in all three planes. The follower load modeled in the FEM produced minimal vertebral rotations in all the three planes. The model was validated by comparing the disc compression at all levels in the lumbar spine with the corresponding results obtained by compressing 10 cadevaric lumbar spines (L1-S1) using the follower load technique described by Patwardhan et al. [1999. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24(10), 1003-1009]. Further validation of the model was performed by comparing the lateral bending and torsion response without pre-load and the flexion-extension response without pre-load and with an 800 N follower pre-load with those obtained using cadaver lumbar spines. Following validation, the FEM was subjected to bending moments in all three planes with and without compressive follower pre-loads of up to 1200 N. Disc compression values and the flexion-extension range of motion under 800 N follower pre-load predicted by the FEM compared well with in vitro results. The current model showed that compressive follower pre-load decreased total as well as segmental ROM in flexion-extension by up to 18%, lateral bending by up to 42%, and torsion by up to 26%.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16843473     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  34 in total

1.  Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; C Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Validation efforts and flexibilities of an eight-year-old human juvenile lumbar spine using a three-dimensional finite element model.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; Chidambaram Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Sylvain Persohn; Sophie Campana; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-07

5.  Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Qing-Dong Wang; Li-Xin Guo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jang-Woo Kim; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  A combined numerical and experimental technique for estimation of the forces and moments in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Hemanth R Gadikota; Jun Miao; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Validation and application of an intervertebral disc finite element model utilizing independently constructed tissue-level constitutive formulations that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and time-dependent.

Authors:  Nathan T Jacobs; Daniel H Cortes; John M Peloquin; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.