Literature DB >> 27538934

Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program.

Nicolò Pecorelli1, Olivia Hershorn1, Gabriele Baldini2, Julio F Fiore1, Barry L Stein3, A Sender Liberman3, Patrick Charlebois3, Franco Carli2, Liane S Feldman4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend incorporation of more than 20 perioperative interventions within an enhanced recovery program (ERP). However, the impact of overall adherence to the pathway and the relative contribution of each intervention are unclear. The aim of this study was to estimate the extent to which adherence to ERP elements is associated with outcomes and identify key ERP elements predicting successful recovery following bowel resection.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data entered in a registry specifically designed for ERPs were reviewed. Patients undergoing elective bowel resection between 2012 and 2014 were treated within an ERP comprising 23 care elements. Primary outcome was successful recovery defined as the absence of complications, discharge by postoperative day 4 and no readmission. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day morbidity, and severity (Comprehensive complication index, CCI, 0-100). Regression analyses were adjusted for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were included in the study. Median primary LOS was 4 days (IQR 3-7). Patients were adherent to median 18 (IQR 16-20) elements. A total of 156 (45 %) patients had successful recovery. Morbidity occurred in 175 (50 %) patients with median CCI 8.6 (IQR 0-22.6). There was a positive association between adherence and successful recovery (OR 1.39 for every additional element, p < 0.001), LOS (11 % reduction for every additional element, p < 0.001), 30-day postoperative morbidity (OR 0.78, p < 0.001), and the CCI (17 % reduction, p < 0.001). Laparoscopy (OR 4.32, p < 0.001), early mobilization out of bed (OR 2.25, p = 0.021), and early termination of IV fluid infusion (OR 2.00, p = 0.013) significantly predicted successful recovery. These factors were also associated with reduced morbidity and complication severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased adherence to ERP interventions was associated with successful early recovery and a reduction in postoperative morbidity and complication severity. In an established ERP where overall adherence was high, laparoscopic approach, perioperative fluid management, and patient mobilization remain key elements associated with improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Length of stay; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Postoperative complications; Postoperative recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538934     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5169-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

1.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Predicting who will fail early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an established enhanced recovery pathway.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Blake Bankwitz; Donya Woconish; Bradley J Champagne; Harry L Reynolds; Sharon L Stein; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Giovanni Capretti; Pepa Kaneva; Amy Neville; Franco Carli; Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Cost-effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery Versus Conventional Perioperative Management for Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Juan Mata; Gabriela A Ghitulescu; Marylise Boutros; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; A Sender Liberman; Gerald M Fried; Nancy Morin; Franco Carli; Eric Latimer; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Julio F Fiore; Ian G Faragher; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Laura Browning; Linda Denehy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Feroci; Elisa Lenzi; Maddalena Baraghini; Alessia Garzi; Andrea Vannucchi; Stefano Cantafio; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  22 in total

1.  Validity of the I-FEED score for postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nourah Alsharqawi; Mohsen Alhashemi; Pepa Kaneva; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Liane S Feldman; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Dissemination in Michigan Hospitals.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; John D Syrjamaki; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Early outcomes of an enhanced recovery protocol for open repair of ventral hernia.

Authors:  Evan Stearns; Margaret A Plymale; Daniel L Davenport; Crystal Totten; Samuel P Carmichael; Charles S Tancula; John Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Predictors of adherence to enhanced recovery pathway elements after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Juan Mata; Julio F Fiore; Nicolo Pecorelli; Barry L Stein; Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Bin Bai; Gang Ji; Yezhou Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of laparoscopy on adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway and readiness for discharge in elective colorectal surgery: Results from the PeriOperative Italian Society registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Felice Borghi; Marco Scatizzi; Giancarlo Missana; Marco Azzola Guicciardi; Stefano Bona; Ferdinando Ficari; Marianna Maspero; Nicolò Pecorelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Risk-stratified clinical pathways decrease the duration of hospitalization and costs of perioperative care after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Morgan Bruno; Whitney Dewhurst; Michael P Kim; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jose Soliz; Barbara Bryce Speer; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  An app for patient education and self-audit within an enhanced recovery program for bowel surgery: a pilot study assessing validity and usability.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Julio F Fiore; Pepa Kaneva; Abarna Somasundram; Patrick Charlebois; A Sender Liberman; Barry L Stein; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection?

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Saba Balvardi; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.