Evan Stearns1, Margaret A Plymale2, Daniel L Davenport3, Crystal Totten2, Samuel P Carmichael2, Charles S Tancula2, John Scott Roth4,5. 1. University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA. 2. Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 4. Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. s.roth@uky.edu. 5. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, C 225, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. s.roth@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based quality improvement pathways reported to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for open ventral hernia repair (VHR) before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, surgical databases were searched for VHR cases for two years prior and eleven months after protocol implementation for retrospective review. Groups were compared on perioperative characteristics and clinical outcomes using chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients underwent VHR (46 patients with ERAS protocol in place and 125 historic controls). Age, gender, ASA Class, comorbidities, and smoking status were similar between the two groups. Body mass index was lower among ERAS patients (p = .038). ERAS patients had earlier return of bowel function (median 3 vs. 4 days) (p = .003) and decreased incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (7 vs. 25%) (p = .008) than controls. CONCLUSION: An ERAS protocol for VHR demonstrated improved patient outcomes. A system-wide culture focused on enhanced recovery is needed to ensure improved patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based quality improvement pathways reported to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for open ventral hernia repair (VHR) before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, surgical databases were searched for VHR cases for two years prior and eleven months after protocol implementation for retrospective review. Groups were compared on perioperative characteristics and clinical outcomes using chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients underwent VHR (46 patients with ERAS protocol in place and 125 historic controls). Age, gender, ASA Class, comorbidities, and smoking status were similar between the two groups. Body mass index was lower among ERAS patients (p = .038). ERAS patients had earlier return of bowel function (median 3 vs. 4 days) (p = .003) and decreased incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (7 vs. 25%) (p = .008) than controls. CONCLUSION: An ERAS protocol for VHR demonstrated improved patient outcomes. A system-wide culture focused on enhanced recovery is needed to ensure improved patient outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical outcomes; Enhanced recovery; Process evaluation; Surgical site infection; Ventral hernia repair
Authors: J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Arman Kahokehr; Tarik Sammour; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Lisa Thompson; Andrew G Hill Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Mylan T Nguyen; Linda T Li; Stephanie C Hicks; Jessica A Davila; James W Suliburk; Mimi Leong; Lillian S Kao; David H Berger; Mike K Liang Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Nicolò Pecorelli; Olivia Hershorn; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Barry L Stein; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Julie L Holihan; Zeinab Alawadi; Robert G Martindale; J Scott Roth; Curtis J Wray; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sebastiaan W Polle; Jan Wind; Jan W Fuhring; Jan Hofland; Dirk J Gouma; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2007-09-13 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: S T Adams; N H Bedwani; L H Massey; A Bhargava; C Byrne; K K Jensen; N J Smart; C J Walsh Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Mark R Jones; Ethan Y Brovman; Amy E Wagenaar; Samuel P Ang; Edward E Whang; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2020-10-15