Literature DB >> 17205493

A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

J Maessen1, C H C Dejong, J Hausel, J Nygren, K Lassen, J Andersen, A G H Kessels, A Revhaug, H Kehlet, O Ljungqvist, K C H Fearon, M F von Meyenfeldt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-centre studies have suggested that enhanced recovery can be achieved with multimodal perioperative care protocols. This international observational study evaluated the implementation of an enhanced recovery programme in five European centres and examined the determinants affecting recovery and length of hospital stay.
METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing elective open colorectal resection above the peritoneal reflection between January 2001 and January 2004 were enrolled in a protocol that defined multiple perioperative care elements. One centre had been developing multimodal perioperative care for 10 years, whereas the other four had previously undertaken traditional care.
RESULTS: The case mix was similar between centres. Protocol compliance before and during the surgical procedure was high, but it was low in the immediate postoperative phase. Patients fulfilled predetermined recovery criteria a median of 3 days after operation but were actually discharged a median of 5 days after surgery. Delay in discharge and the development of major complications prolonged length of stay. Previous experience with fast-track surgery was associated with a shorter hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Functional recovery in 3 days after colorectal resection could be achieved in daily practice. A protocol is not enough to enable discharge of patients on the day of functional recovery; more experience and better organization of care may be required. Copyright (c) 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205493     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  113 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery program following colorectal resection in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Paul L Cathcart; Tan H A Arulampalam; Matthew G Tutton; Roger W Motson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Amy Glicksman; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Matthias Schwarzbach; Anne Kring; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Till Hasenberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted and open high anterior resection within an ERAS protocol.

Authors:  Ulf O Gustafsson; Marit Tiefenthal; Anders Thorell; Olle Ljungqvist; Jonas Nygrens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; José Manuel Ramirez; Daniel Callejo; Xavier Viñas; Sergio Maeso; Roger Cabezali; Elena Miranda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Laura Torselli; Mariarita Panelli; Angelo Nespoli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  How new is new?

Authors:  Wolfgang Schwenk
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-05

9.  Sham feed or sham? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of gum chewing on gut function after elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Craig N Parnaby; Alisdair J MacDonald; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.