Nourah Alsharqawi1, Mohsen Alhashemi1, Pepa Kaneva1, Gabriele Baldini1, Julio F Fiore1, Liane S Feldman1, Lawrence Lee2,3. 1. Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. larry.lee@mcgill.ca. 3. McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boul. Decarie, DS1-3310, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. larry.lee@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is common after gastrointestinal surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and costs. However, POI is poorly defined. The I-FEED score is a novel outcome measure for POI, developed by expert consensus. It contains five elements (intake, response to nausea treatment, emesis, exam, and duration, each scored with 0, 1, or 3 points) and classifies patients into normal, postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). However, it has not yet been validated in a clinical context. The objective was to provide validity evidence for the I-FEED score to measure the construct of POI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: Data previously collected from a clinical trial investigating the impact of different perioperative fluid management strategies on primary POI in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy (2013-2015) were analyzed. Patients were managed by a longstanding Enhanced Recovery program (expected length of stay (LOS): 3 days). Daily I-FEED scores were generated (normal 0-2, POGI 3-5, POGD 6+ points) up to hospital discharge or postoperative day 7. Validity was assessed by testing the hypotheses that I-FEED score was higher (1) in patients with longer time to GI3 (tolerating diet + flatus/bowel movement), (2) with longer LOS (> 3 days vs shorter), (3) in patients with complications vs without, (4) in patients with poorer recovery (measured by Quality of Recovery-9 questionnaire). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included for analysis (mean age 61.7 years (SD 15.2), 57% male, 71% malignancy, and 39.1% rectal resection). Median LOS was 4 days [IQR3-5], and 32% experienced postoperative in-hospital morbidity. Overall, 48% of patients were categorized as normal, 22% POGI, and 30% POGD. The data supported all 4 hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for POI after colorectal surgery.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is common after gastrointestinal surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and costs. However, POI is poorly defined. The I-FEED score is a novel outcome measure for POI, developed by expert consensus. It contains five elements (intake, response to nausea treatment, emesis, exam, and duration, each scored with 0, 1, or 3 points) and classifies patients into normal, postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). However, it has not yet been validated in a clinical context. The objective was to provide validity evidence for the I-FEED score to measure the construct of POI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: Data previously collected from a clinical trial investigating the impact of different perioperative fluid management strategies on primary POI in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy (2013-2015) were analyzed. Patients were managed by a longstanding Enhanced Recovery program (expected length of stay (LOS): 3 days). Daily I-FEED scores were generated (normal 0-2, POGI 3-5, POGD 6+ points) up to hospital discharge or postoperative day 7. Validity was assessed by testing the hypotheses that I-FEED score was higher (1) in patients with longer time to GI3 (tolerating diet + flatus/bowel movement), (2) with longer LOS (> 3 days vs shorter), (3) in patients with complications vs without, (4) in patients with poorer recovery (measured by Quality of Recovery-9 questionnaire). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included for analysis (mean age 61.7 years (SD 15.2), 57% male, 71% malignancy, and 39.1% rectal resection). Median LOS was 4 days [IQR3-5], and 32% experienced postoperative in-hospital morbidity. Overall, 48% of patients were categorized as normal, 22% POGI, and 30% POGD. The data supported all 4 hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for POI after colorectal surgery.
Authors: A M Wolthuis; G Bislenghi; S Fieuws; A de Buck van Overstraeten; G Boeckxstaens; A D'Hoore Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Lawrence Lee; Chao Li; Tara Landry; Eric Latimer; Franco Carli; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Nicolò Pecorelli; Olivia Hershorn; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Barry L Stein; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Lawrence Lee; Juan Mata; Gabriela A Ghitulescu; Marylise Boutros; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; A Sender Liberman; Gerald M Fried; Nancy Morin; Franco Carli; Eric Latimer; Liane S Feldman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Pierre H Chapuis; Les Bokey; Anil Keshava; Matthew J F X Rickard; Peter Stewart; Christopher J Young; Owen F Dent Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Caroline B Terwee; Lidwine B Mokkink; Dirk L Knol; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: J Ocaña; J C García-Pérez; M Labalde-Martínez; G Rodríguez-Velasco; I Moreno; A Vivas; I Clemente-Esteban; A Ballestero; P Abadía; E Ferrero; J M Fernández-Cebrián; J Die Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 3.699
Authors: Marie Tran-McCaslin; Motahar Basam; Andrew Rudikoff; Dhilan Thuraisingham; Elisabeth C McLemore Journal: Am Surg Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 1.002
Authors: Ángela Rodríguez-Padilla; Germán Morales-Martín; Rocío Pérez-Quintero; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Rafael Balongo-García; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 5.717