Literature DB >> 24101012

Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery.

Julio F Fiore1, Ian G Faragher, Andrea Bialocerkowski, Laura Browning, Linda Denehy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-term recovery after colorectal surgery has been traditionally investigated through length of stay (LOS). However, this measure is influenced by several confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of assessing the time to achieve standardized discharge criteria (time to readiness for discharge, or TRD) as a measure of short-term recovery. In a secondary analysis, we compared sample size requirements for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TRD or LOS as outcome measures.
METHODS: Seventy patients participated in the construct validity study and 21 patients participated in the reliability study. TRD was defined as the number of days to achieve discharge criteria previously defined by consensus. Construct validity was investigated by testing six hypothesis based on the assumption that TRD measures short-term recovery. Reliability was calculated by comparing measures of TRD by two independent assessors. Variability estimates (standard deviations) of LOS and TRD were used for sample size calculations.
RESULTS: Five of the six hypotheses were supported by the data (p < 0.05). Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.99). Sample size estimations showed that RCTs using TRD as an outcome measure require approximately 23 % less participants compared to RCTs using LOS.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research support the construct-validity and reliability of TRD as a measure of short-term recovery. Using TRD as an alternative to LOS may reduce sample size requirements in future RCTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24101012     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2208-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  47 in total

1.  Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges?

Authors:  F Carli; N Mayo
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Janet Wittes
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Factors affecting length of stay following colonic resection.

Authors:  Thomas M Schmelzer; Gamal Mostafa; Amy E Lincourt; Steven M Camp; Kent W Kercher; Timothy S Kuwada; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C Challand; R Struthers; J R Sneyd; P D Erasmus; N Mellor; K B Hosie; G Minto
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi technique.

Authors:  Julio F Fiore; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Laura Browning; Ian G Faragher; Linda Denehy
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery.

Authors:  G MacKay; U Ihedioha; A McConnachie; M Serpell; R G Molloy; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  A Kahokehr; P Robertson; T Sammour; M Soop; A G Hill
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  19 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luigi Beretta; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marianna Maspero; Umberto Casiraghi; Felice Borghi; Luca Pellegrino; Stefano Bona; Roberta Monzani; Gianluigi Ferrari; Danilo Radrizzani; Riccardo Iuliani; Carlo Bima; Marco Scatizzi; Giancarlo Missana; Marco Azzola Guicciardi; Andrea Muratore; Michele Crespi; Hedayat Bouzari; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Ferdinando Ficari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-15

3.  Enhanced recovery programs in liver surgery.

Authors:  C H C Dejong; R M van Dam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Sara Nobile; Stefano Partelli; Luca Cardinali; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luigi Beretta; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Impact of laparoscopy on adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway and readiness for discharge in elective colorectal surgery: Results from the PeriOperative Italian Society registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Felice Borghi; Marco Scatizzi; Giancarlo Missana; Marco Azzola Guicciardi; Stefano Bona; Ferdinando Ficari; Marianna Maspero; Nicolò Pecorelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Olivia Hershorn; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Barry L Stein; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Enhanced Recovery Program in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: Results from the PeriOperative Italian Society Registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Scatizzi; Felice Borghi; Giancarlo Missana; Danilo Radrizzani
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  ERAS, length of stay and private insurance: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Diana A Celio; Roberto Poggi; Mike Schmalzbauer; Raffaele Rosso; Pietro Majno; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Construct validity and responsiveness of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) as a measure of recovery after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Makena Pook; Hiba Elhaj; Charbel El Kefraoui; Saba Balvardi; Nicolo Pecorelli; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Implementing an enhanced recovery program after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: is it feasible?

Authors:  Mariëlle M E Coolsen; Maikel Bakens; Ronald M van Dam; Steven W M Olde Damink; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.